Differences between the Francis Formula & Torrecelli Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter 14andyhigg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The Francis Formula improves upon the Torricelli Formula by incorporating the effects of water contraction as it flows over a weir, leading to more accurate flow rate calculations. The expression for the Francis Formula is Q = 2.49Cd√2gh, where Cd represents the coefficient of contraction, g is gravity, h is the weir height, and Q is the flow rate. In contrast, the Torricelli Formula does not consider contraction, making it less precise for weir flow calculations. Understanding these differences is crucial for solving related exam problems effectively. Mastery of both formulas will enhance problem-solving skills in fluid dynamics.
14andyhigg
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My name is Andy I am a new user here. I am having a bit of trouble deriving the difference between the Francis Formula and the Torricelli Formula. I have the following question to work on as part of many which could be covered in an exam shortly:

Provide an expression for the Francis Formula used for calculating flow over a weir, explaining any improvement over the simple Torricelli derived formula and a reliance on the concept of contractions to a weir.

I am comfortable using each of the formulas and solving problems based on them but I am not too sure on how they relate to each other and the benefits of using one or the other.

Any advice would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Andy, welcome to the forum!

The difference between the Francis Formula and the Torricelli Formula is that the Francis Formula takes into account the effects of contraction of the water when passing over a weir. The Torricelli Formula does not account for this contraction, while the Francis Formula does, which makes it more accurate. The expression for the Francis Formula is Q = 2.49Cd√2gh, where Cd is the coefficient of contraction, g is the acceleration due to gravity, h is the height of the weir, and Q is the volumetric flow rate of water.

I hope this helps and good luck on your upcoming exam!
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top