Differences of Classical Mechanics when learned with Calc vs algebra?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights significant differences between classical mechanics taught with calculus versus algebra. Participants argue that algebra-based physics classes lack depth, making concepts confusing and less interesting. Calculus is seen as essential for understanding the underlying principles of physics, as it provides context and clarity. Algebra classes are criticized for presenting simplified equations without explaining their broader implications. Overall, the consensus is that calculus-based physics offers a more comprehensive and engaging learning experience.
martinlematre
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
what are the differences? Every example I find usually has a derivative or integral or some kind of calculus defined concept that seems to make it easier or more understandable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you mean "calc v algebra"? I don't understand the difference.
 
Do you mean "what's the difference between intro physics calculus vs. intro physics algebra?"

If that's what you mean, the courses are very different.

I had the misfortune of having to take an algebra physics class. In my opinion, without calculus, it's way more confusing.

There should never be an "algebra" based physics class. Calculus makes physics much more interesting and understandable. Until I picked up a calculus text, nothing made sense.

The actual questions you're solving are pretty similar, it's just that in an algebra based class, you're never really told why, just how. Avoid algebra based physics at all costs, because the math used is pretty easy, simple derivatives and integrals, nothing more.
 
Astrum said:
Do you mean "what's the difference between intro physics calculus vs. intro physics algebra?"

If that's what you mean, the courses are very different.

I had the misfortune of having to take an algebra physics class. In my opinion, without calculus, it's way more confusing.

There should never be an "algebra" based physics class. Calculus makes physics much more interesting and understandable. Until I picked up a calculus text, nothing made sense.

The actual questions you're solving are pretty similar, it's just that in an algebra based class, you're never really told why, just how. Avoid algebra based physics at all costs, because the math used is pretty easy, simple derivatives and integrals, nothing more.

wlel I am already in it lol, not making a lot of sense to me (the concepts i am being freshly exposed to)
 
What astrum has said is all true, algebra based physics classes are only one step above pop science books.

And in fact they teach many highly restrictive equations and treat them as general laws, it is very underwhelming.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Advice on Resources -- A really good classical mechanics book?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Classical Source recommendation on Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Checking if a stationary point is a minimum using Lagrangian Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Energy formulation of classical mechanics?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Hamiltonian in Classical mechanics?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Classical The best introductory mechanics textbook
Replies
39
Views
7K
Mathematical background concerning classical physics/mechanics.
Replies
5
Views
2K
Classical Rotation: Referencing Rotational Motion in Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
A Quest to Perfectly Understand Classical Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Classical Recommend books about classical mechanics please
Replies
11
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top