Different Periods of Brass Rod and Ball on String

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Rod String
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differing oscillation periods of a brass rod and a brass ball on a string, despite having the same length. The key factors influencing their periods are their moments of inertia and the positions of their centers of mass. Gravity acts on the center of mass for both objects, but the varying distances and moments of inertia result in different oscillation behaviors. Even if the center of mass were aligned, the distinct moments of inertia would still lead to different periods. Understanding these dynamics requires knowledge of rotational dynamics principles.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Lets say I have a brass rod of length L, and then a brass ball attached by a string so that both objects are the same length, the brass rod and the ball on a string have the same length.
Now i will pull them back to the same point an let them oscillate like a pendulum. Why do they have different periods? Their centers of masses are at different places, is this the reason why?
Is gravity acting on their center of masses over different distances? And they are both allowed to rotate from the top of their frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, they have different moments of inertia. Secondly, yes, gravity acts at the center of mass which is different for the two systems.
 
if I made the rod longer to where its center of mass was the same as the ball would they oscillate together?
 
The periods depend on their moments of inertia, not just their centers of mass. If you want to calculate the period just google something like "rotational dynamics".
 
okay why would it depend on their moment of inertia, If their center of masses are the same and gravity makes all things accelerate at the same rate it seems like they would fall together. It just seems weird to me.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top