Different Perspectives in Theory Only

  • Thread starter mikelus
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of the speed of light and its relationship to time and the universe. The speaker ponders whether light has a constant speed, and mentions the idea of a black hole in the center of the universe pulling light at a constant speed. They also consider the perspective of time and how it affects our perception of events, such as the burning out of a star. The conversation ends with a thought on the potential purpose of the spacing in between sentences.
  • #1
mikelus
91
0
in theory only

I was wondering if their was a speed for light? I always thought of light as something that would change and
bend the rules. How ever if there's a black hole in our center of our universe Pulling the light in at a constant speed then
yes light would have a constant speed. I would think that light would travel as fast as it was turned on, meaning once
the star erupted into a star than that is the speed of the star in (their time, in ours) because we would witness it as fast
as the star erupted in our time since it traveled in their time to ours. This meaning that we are know more close than the next galaxy to the "center" of the universe. Since our time is no greater than the next galaxies. It's all the same. we witness the star erupting at the same rate it is burning or burning out. Say if we wanted to travel to the star and we took
off in our ship, by the time we got there the star could be burned out and we could have witnessed it on the way. say if
we traveled at the speed of light we could be there that much faster and would have seen it burn out that much faster.
But is it true to say it was burned out before or after the trip to the next galaxy? Is it fare to know that it was burned out
on such and such a date of our time according to our caculations. because what if the star wasn't burning out until we
went back in time to discover it, and we discovered it had actually had not been born yet. Say if we instead went into the future to see if it hadn't burned out yet. It's all these different perspectives that makes life so upredictable.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Perhaps the spacing between every one and a half sentences is a suggestion for us to read the Philosophy forums?
 

1. What is the concept of different perspectives in theory only?

Different perspectives in theory only refers to the idea that there can be multiple interpretations or understandings of a particular theory or concept. These perspectives may stem from different cultural, societal, or individual backgrounds and can result in varying viewpoints.

2. How does considering different perspectives enhance scientific theories?

By considering different perspectives, scientists are able to identify potential biases or limitations in their theories and make adjustments to create a more well-rounded and accurate understanding. It also allows for a more comprehensive exploration of a topic, leading to potential new insights and discoveries.

3. Can different perspectives lead to conflicting theories?

Yes, different perspectives can lead to conflicting theories. This is because each perspective may prioritize or emphasize different aspects of the theory, resulting in varying conclusions or interpretations. However, this can also lead to healthy debates and further exploration of the topic.

4. How can scientists ensure they are considering a diverse range of perspectives?

Scientists can ensure they are considering a diverse range of perspectives by actively seeking out and including individuals from different backgrounds and cultures in their research. Additionally, they can also engage in critical thinking and self-reflection to identify their own biases and actively work to overcome them.

5. Are there any potential drawbacks to considering different perspectives in theory only?

One potential drawback is that it can be challenging to synthesize and reconcile conflicting perspectives, which can lead to a lack of consensus or clarity in the scientific community. It may also be time-consuming and require additional effort to incorporate diverse perspectives into research and theories. However, the benefits of considering different perspectives often outweigh these potential drawbacks.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
542
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
887
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
376
Replies
6
Views
454
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
663
Back
Top