Different representations of SU3 and resultant multiplets

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I have a very basic query about multiplets. In the SU(3) approach strongly interacting particles, quarks and hadrons are the basis vectors of irreducible representations of SU(3). Now, quarks and hadrons are definite properties with define eigenvalues of hypercharge and isospin: to put it another way, there is only one set of quarks and hadrons. But there are many different irreducible representations of SU(3). For example, we are free to choose the Cartan representation, or the Gell-Mann representation, of the SU(3) matrices as our representation of SU(3). How do we know that these different representations will all produce particles with the same set of eigenvalues of isospin and hypercharge - ie, how do we know whatever representation we choose, we'll get back our actual quarks and the hadrons? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
quarks and hadrons are NOT the basis vectors.
 
Really? But Lichtenberg for example in 'Unitary Symmetry and Elementary Particles' (p34) writes "The basis vectors of an irreducible unitary representation of a symmetry transformation denote a set of quantum mechanical states. These states are said to constitute a multiplet." The three quarks, and the baryon octet etc, all constitute multiplets. So why is it they're not basis vectors? -- Thanks a lot.
 
If flavor SU(3) was a perfect symmetry of the world, then all of the baryons in the baryon octet would be indistinguishable. They would all have the same mass, charge, etc. But it isn't. It's broken by the mass and charge differences of the up, down and strange quarks. It's these symmetry-breaking effects that pick out which components of an SU(3) multiplet correspond to observed baryons.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top