I Different results for the Range of a projectile

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions affecting the range of a projectile, emphasizing that the standard range formula applies only when the projectile lands at the same height from which it was launched. If launched horizontally from ground level, the projectile does not achieve horizontal displacement, resulting in a range of zero. The general range formula incorporates vertical displacement, allowing for scenarios where the projectile lands higher or lower than the launch height. The derivation of this formula is based on kinematic equations that account for time of flight and vertical displacement. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately predicting projectile motion outcomes.
RIJU101
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
My question is from the Range of a projectile. Range is displacement of the projectile through X-axis. We all know the formula of range is R=(V²Sin2x)/g. Where "x" is the angle at which the object is thrown. When we throw the object at 0° angle the value of range will be Zero(0) that means this value concludes that object will not displace. But actually it will displace horizontally so there should be a value of Range as per the definition. Thats my question why the concept and result differs?
May be It's a concept problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for the range that you quoted is valid only if the projectile lands at the same height from which it was launched. If it is launched horizontally, it must start at some height above ground and will not return to the same height from which it was launched. If it's launched at ground level, it is already there, so zero horizontal displacement.

On edit
To complete the picture, the general expression for the range of a projectile starting with initial velocity ##\mathbf v=(v_{0x},v_{0y})## is given by
$$R=\frac{v_{0x}}{g}\left[v_{0y}+\sqrt{v_{0y}^2-2 g\Delta y}\right]$$ where ##\Delta y## is the vertical displacement, positive if the projectile lands higher and negative if it lands lower than launched. When ##\Delta y =0## the expression above reduces to the one you quoted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and berkeman
kuruman said:
The formula for the range that you quoted is valid only if the projectile lands at the same height from which it was launched. If it is launched horizontally, it must start at some height above ground and will not return to the same height from which it was launched. If it's launched at ground level, it is already there, so zero horizontal displacement.

On edit
To complete the picture, the general expression for the range of a projectile starting with initial velocity ##\mathbf v=(v_{0x},v_{0y})## is given by
$$R=\frac{v_{0x}}{g}\left[v_{0y}+\sqrt{v_{0y}^2-2 g\Delta y}\right]$$ where ##\Delta y## is the vertical displacement, positive if the projectile lands higher and negative if it lands lower than launched. When ##\Delta y =0## the expression above reduces to the one you quoted.
Yes you are right. Sorry I didn't explained it correctly. I'm not talking about throwing the object from a certain height above the ground, in that case the object will displace a bit and vertically fall on the ground then range will be zero. But I'm considering a case where I'm standing on a ground and project a ball(not from a height, very close to ground) in 0°projection angle that means the ball will go horizontally, it will roll on the ground. In that case how the range can be zero.
 
kuruman said:
The formula for the range that you quoted is valid only if the projectile lands at the same height from which it was launched. If it is launched horizontally, it must start at some height above ground and will not return to the same height from which it was launched. If it's launched at ground level, it is already there, so zero horizontal displacement.

On edit
To complete the picture, the general expression for the range of a projectile starting with initial velocity ##\mathbf v=(v_{0x},v_{0y})## is given by
$$R=\frac{v_{0x}}{g}\left[v_{0y}+\sqrt{v_{0y}^2-2 g\Delta y}\right]$$ where ##\Delta y## is the vertical displacement, positive if the projectile lands higher and negative if it lands lower than launched. When ##\Delta y =0## the expression above reduces to the one
Do you tell me how this formula derived ?
 
RIJU101 said:
...it will roll on the ground. In that case how the range can be zero...
This is a formula for throw distance, not for rolling distance.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
RIJU101 said:
Do you tell me how this formula derived ?
Sure. The traditionall approach is to start with the kinematic equations in the x and y directions.
##x=v_{0x}t~;~~y=y_0+v_{0y}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2##.
Let ##t_{\!f}=~##the time the projectile is in the air (time of flight). At that time the projectile is at horizontal position ##x_f=R## and is vertically displaced by ##\Delta y.##

From the first equation, ##t_{\!f}=\dfrac{R}{v_{0x}}.## If this is substituted in the second equation, one gets $$\Delta y=y_{\!f}-y_0=v_{0y}\frac{R}{v_{0x}}-\frac{1}{2}g\left(\dfrac{R}{v_{0x}}\right)^2.$$This is a quadratic equation that you can solve for ##R## the usual way. Only one of the two solutions gives positive ##R## values for any value of ##\Delta y.##
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top