Different types and kinds of storing fuels

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacquesl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the safety and practicality of storing different types of fuels, specifically comparing methanol and hydrogen. Hydrogen, while considered safe due to its upward burning nature in case of a leak, requires stringent safety measures for storage, including the use of specialized equipment and secure handling protocols. Methanol, in contrast, is easier to store, needing only a metal can or glass bottle and basic safety training. A liter of methanol contains significantly more energy than a liter of hydrogen gas at atmospheric pressure, making it potentially more dangerous in an incident. The conversation also touches on the complexities of storing liquid hydrogen, which involves high pressure and increased safety risks. Concerns are raised about the storage of hydrogen and oxygen in large tanks, particularly in high-stakes environments like space missions, highlighting the inherent risks of explosive reactions. Overall, methanol is viewed as the safer option for fuel storage compared to hydrogen, especially when considering the additional risks associated with liquid hydrogen.
Jacquesl
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Different types and kinds of storing fuels

What will be the most dangerous way to store fuel if you must choose between gas / liquid.

1 Liter of Methanol
Or
1 Liter of Hydrogen
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
dunno about how they store methanol, but hydrogen is surprisingly safe when u store it whether gas or liquid form. ur main concern would be leakages and modern technologies have solved this issue. as for flammability the good thing about a hydrogen spil out catching flames is that it burns upward unlike liquid fuels which spill stick to the ground and burn. that explains why there was some survivors in the hindenburg fire.(the hydrogen burned upwards)
 
From a safety perspective, hydrogen requires more effort to handle safely. If it is handled under pressure, the cylinder must be rented (monthly demurrage) or purchased outright, it must be secured safely with clamps, kept away from oxidizers (20 minute fire wall, I believe), requires a pressure regulator specific for hydrogen. Non-sparking tools should be used to attach regulators. For only a liter of gas, a lecture bottle can be used. These are sold with the hydrogen and raise the cost of this minor amount of hydrogen significantly. Disposal of the empty lecture (small) cylinder should be done according to a safety plan that renders the cylinder inert and all markings must be removed, etc...

Methanol on the other hand only requires a metal can or glass bottle and a flammable cabinet. The usual MSDS, safety plan, right to know training, etc applies to both hydrogen and methanol.

A liter of methanol contains much more energy than a liter of hydrogen gas at 1 atmosphere and so the methanol can cause much more damage in an "event".

If you are asking about a liter of liquid hydrogen, multiply the danger and effort by a factor of about 100 for safe handling. In that case, methanol is orders of magnitude the much safer option.
 
How about huge hydrogen and oxygen storage tanks. How will that be treated?

If you are asking about a liter of liquid hydrogen

Then will hydrogen become a liquid and how can that be done, will it require the same process that LPG?
 
well oxygen and their fuels are stored on space shuttles in different chambers! so i don't quite get ur question jacques!.
As for hydrogen it becomes liquid under pressure, that's one way to store it efficiently.
 
No it’s ok, I wasn’t so 100% sure about then you store gasses. So then NASA stores their Hydrogen and Oxygen, won't that hold a high risk of exploding?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top