The discussion centers on the safety and practicality of storing different types of fuels, specifically comparing methanol and hydrogen. Hydrogen, while considered safe due to its upward burning nature in case of a leak, requires stringent safety measures for storage, including the use of specialized equipment and secure handling protocols. Methanol, in contrast, is easier to store, needing only a metal can or glass bottle and basic safety training. A liter of methanol contains significantly more energy than a liter of hydrogen gas at atmospheric pressure, making it potentially more dangerous in an incident. The conversation also touches on the complexities of storing liquid hydrogen, which involves high pressure and increased safety risks. Concerns are raised about the storage of hydrogen and oxygen in large tanks, particularly in high-stakes environments like space missions, highlighting the inherent risks of explosive reactions. Overall, methanol is viewed as the safer option for fuel storage compared to hydrogen, especially when considering the additional risks associated with liquid hydrogen.