Undergrad Different types of vector fields?

Click For Summary
Vector fields can be categorized based on how the position vector is defined in relation to time and other parameters. The first equation represents a vector field at a specific point in spacetime, while the second describes the field experienced by a particle moving through space at a given time. The third equation involves a parameterization of curves, which is more complex and typically addressed later in coursework. In the context of Maxwell's equations, fields are often denoted without arguments, serving as a general representation of the vector fields. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the behavior of vector fields in physics.
Hacca
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Vector fields confuses me. What are the differences between (##t## could be any variable, not just time):

1. If the position vector don't have an argument, ##\mathbf{r}=x\mathbf{\hat e}_x+y\mathbf{\hat e}_y+z\mathbf{\hat e}_z=(x,y,z)## so
##\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)=E_x(\mathbf{r},t)\mathbf{\hat e}_x+E_y(\mathbf{r},t)\mathbf{\hat e}_y+E_z(\mathbf{r},t)\mathbf{\hat e}_z##

2. The position vector have an argument ##t##, ##\mathbf{r}(t)=x(t)\mathbf{\hat e}_x+y(t)\mathbf{\hat e}_y+z(t)\mathbf{\hat e}_z=(x(t),y(t),z(t))## so
##\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}(t),t)=E_x(\mathbf{r}(t),t)\mathbf{\hat e}_x+E_y(\mathbf{r}(t),t)\mathbf{\hat e}_y+ E_z(\mathbf{r}(t),t)\mathbf{\hat e}_z##

3. The position vector have a different argument, say ##u## and ##u\neq t##, ##\mathbf{r}(u)=x(u)\mathbf{\hat e}_x+y(u)\mathbf{\hat e}_y+z(u)\mathbf{\hat e}_z=(x(u),y(u),z(u))## so
##\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}(u),t)=E_x(\mathbf{r}(u),t)\mathbf{\hat e}_x+
E_y(\mathbf{r}(u),t)\mathbf{\hat e}_y+E_z(\mathbf{r}(u),t)\mathbf{\hat e}_z##

Are all vector fields? Are all ##\mathbb{R}^4 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^3##?

Also, in the context of Maxwell's equations, the fields are denoted without an argument, just ##\mathbf{E}##, ##\mathbf{B}## etc. Is it just an abbreviation for any of the above?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the position vector has an argument like t it means its describing a path with t as the parameter

In the case if the E field r can take on any position and can take on any time meaning the E field varies with position and with time.
 
Equation 1 tells us the vector field at an arbitrary point in space and time (spacetime). The arguments ##\mathbf r## and ##t## specify that point.

Equation 2 tells us the vector field experienced at time ##t## by a particle that is moving through space in such a way that its location at time ##t## is ##\mathbf r(t)##. The equation gives less information about the vector field than Equation 1, but more information about the location of the particle.

To understand Equation 3 you need to understand the parametrisation of curves. This equation applies when we are interested in the field at points on a curve that is parametrised by the function ##\mathbf r:\mathbb R\to \mathbf R^3## that gives us a position in space ##\mathbf r(u)## for each parameter value ##u##. The situations where this would be used are somewhat more complex so it's best not to worry about this until it's covered in your course and you're given problems involving it. But if you have a particular example, feel free to ask about it. Note that if the curve is the path of a particle and we parametrise it by the time variable, this type of equation turns into type 2. In other words, Equation 2 is a special case of Equation 3.
 
What would the same question be, if formulated with the velocity vector fields ##\mathbf{v}\, , \,\mathbf{v}(x,t) \, , \,\mathbf{v}(x(t),t)\, , \,\mathbf{v}(x(t),s)## instead of ##\mathbf{E}## and ##\mathbf{B}##?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K