Graduate Differentiability of a function between manifolds

Click For Summary
A function f: M → N between two submanifolds M^n and N^k is defined as differentiable if the composition f ∘ φ⁻¹ is differentiable for any chart (U, φ) of M. This implies that the differentiability aligns with the standard definition for functions in several variables, leading to the expression d(f ∘ φ⁻¹)(x) = df(φ⁻¹(x)) dφ⁻¹(x). The transformation allows the differentiation of f through the mapping to a real-valued function g = f ∘ φ⁻¹. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering the inverse mapping ψ⁻¹ from ℝ^K back to N for a complete understanding of the differentiability. Overall, the relationship between the differentiability of f and the transformations involved is crucial for defining df.
Maxi1995
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,
let $$M^n \subset \mathbb{R}^N$$ $$N^k \subset \mathbb{R}^K$$
be two submanifolds.
We say a function $$f : M \rightarrow N$$ is differentiable if and only if for every map $$(U,\varphi)$$ of M the transformation

$$f \circ \varphi^{-1}: \varphi(U) \subset \mathbb{R}^N \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^K$$

is differentiable.

Does this mean that it is differentiable in the sense of a "normal" function in several variables, thus to say $$d(f \circ \varphi^{-1})(x)=df(\varphi^{-1}(x))d\varphi^{-1}(x)$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not have ##df(\ldots)## while are defining it. You transform ##f## to ##g=f\circ \varphi^{-1}## which is a real valued function which you know how to differentiate. Thus you have ##dg=df\,d\varphi^{-1}## which defines you ##df##.
 
Thank you very much. :bow:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
916
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
571
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K