Differential Equation for the Orbit - Goldstein Chapter 3

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on a specific differential equation from Classical Mechanics as presented in Goldstein's third edition, particularly on page 87. The equation in question is related to the dynamics of orbits and involves the terms for radial distance and angular momentum. A participant points out a potential misreading of the equation, emphasizing that the correct form represents a central force, assuming the use of reduced mass. The discussion highlights the importance of careful notation, particularly distinguishing between the symbols '1' and 'l'.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Classical Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with differential equations in physics
  • Knowledge of angular momentum and central forces
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation accurately
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Goldstein's Classical Mechanics, focusing on Chapter 3 and the derivation of equations of motion
  • Study the concept of reduced mass in orbital mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of dimensional analysis in physics equations
  • Explore additional resources on central force motion and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying Classical Mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to orbital dynamics and differential equations.

getPhysical()
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello,

A question here about Classical Mechanics, Goldstein (Ed. 3)

On page 87 you have expression 3.33 which goes something like

[tex] \[<br /> \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{d\theta}\left(\frac{1}{mr^2}\frac{dr}{d\theta}\right)-\frac{l^2}{mr^3}=f(r)<br /> \][/tex]

I appear to end up with

[tex] \[<br /> \frac{l}{r^2}\frac{d}{d\theta}\left(\frac{l}{mr^2}\frac{dr}{d\theta}\right)-\frac{l^2}{mr^3}=f(r)<br /> \][/tex]

instead. Any clues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second equation is the correct expression for a central force f(r) (assuming that your m is the reduced mass). Are you sure you are not simply misreading Goldstein? The first equation is not even dimensionally correct. 1's and l's often look very much alike.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: themooseyoyos

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K