Differential equation modeling question

AI Thread Summary
Linear differential equations are defined as equations where the dependent variable and its derivatives appear linearly. An equation like "...ty" is still considered linear if it can be expressed in the standard form with coefficients that may depend on the independent variable. The relationship between linear differential equations and linear algebra is highlighted by the analogy of operators acting on functions, similar to matrices acting on vectors. In this framework, the operator must maintain linearity, allowing for operations like multiplication by functions and differentiation. The inhomogeneous term and coefficients in these equations can be arbitrary functions, provided they do not depend on the dependent variable itself.
sergey90
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, just embarking on the journey of modeling with differential equations and solving them. I have a more conceptual quesiton. Linear differential equations in my book are defined to be ones where F(t, y, y', y'',...,yn) = 0 is a linear function of the dependent var y and all of its derivatives. Does this mean that if in the equation we have say "...ty" it is still linear? If yes, then how does this translate to linear algebra where in a system of linear equations the functions have to be linear for all the variables, including the "free" ones?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A linear differential equation has the form:

a_{n}(t)\frac{d^{n}y}{dt^{n}} + a_{n-1}(t)\frac{d^{n-1}y}{dt^{n-1}} +...+ a_{1}(t)\frac{dy}{dt} + a_{0}(t)y = F(t)

If a_{0}(t) = t, then "...ty" is linear if the entire equation can be written in the form above.

As for how this relates to linear algebra, it is important to note that y is not a "free variable", it is a function of t.
 
sergey90 said:
Hi guys, just embarking on the journey of modeling with differential equations and solving them. I have a more conceptual quesiton. Linear differential equations in my book are defined to be ones where F(t, y, y', y'',...,yn) = 0 is a linear function of the dependent var y and all of its derivatives. Does this mean that if in the equation we have say "...ty" it is still linear? If yes, then how does this translate to linear algebra where in a system of linear equations the functions have to be linear for all the variables, including the "free" ones?
I'm guessing you're familiar with linear algebra in the form of matrix algebra? Where the important objects are vectors and matrices, and you can multiply a matrix by a vector to get a different vector? Well, linear differential equations work the same way, except just replace vectors with functions and matrices with operators.

In this sense, an operator is something which acts on a function to give a different function, just like a matrix acts on a vector to produce a different vector. Specifically, that means it has to be linear: if \mathbf{A} and \mathbf{B} are operators and f and g are functions, you need
\begin{align}\mathbf{A}[f(x)+g(x)] &= \mathbf{A}f(x)+\mathbf{A}g(x) \\ (\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{B})f(x) &= \mathbf{A}f(x) + \mathbf{B}f(x)\end{align}
among other properties. Subject to these constraints, there are basically two fundamental things you can do to a function: either multiply it by some quantity which may depend on x, or take its derivative with respect to x. Any linear transformation of one function into another can be represented by a linear combination of multiplications and derivatives.

Now, as you know, when you solve a linear system of algebraic equations using matrix algebra, you're solving a system of the form
A\vec{x} = \vec{b}
A linear differential equation is the same thing, only \vec{x} and \vec{b} become functions and A becomes an operator:
\mathbf{A}f(x) = g(x)
Remember that \mathbf{A} is a linear combination of multiplicative factors and derivatives. So in general, you can have something like
\mathbf{A}f(x) = c(x) f(x) + a_1f'(x) + a_2f''(x) + \cdots
Hopefully you can see that with this definition, the differential equation above can be written
F(x, f', f'', \cdots) = -g(x) + c(x) f(x) + a_1f'(x) + a_2f''(x) + \cdots = 0
The inhomogeneous term g(x) and the multiplicative coefficient c(x) can be any arbitrary (fixed) functions of x, they just can't depend on the function f.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top