Differential Equations Text: Finding Rigor & Clarity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a rigorous yet elementary text on differential equations, with a particular focus on the distinction between a function and its value. Participants express concerns about traditional notations and their clarity in conveying mathematical concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for a text that clearly distinguishes between a function and its value, similar to Spivak's approach in his Calculus book.
  • Another participant suggests that the distinction is a pure math concern and may not be adequately addressed in applied math texts, which often overlook such details.
  • A participant mentions that Tenenbaum and Pollard do explain the distinction but later use notation that can obscure it, especially when introducing new concepts.
  • Several participants provide links to various texts and resources that may address the concerns raised, including suggestions for further reading.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to learning differential equations or the clarity of existing texts. Multiple viewpoints are presented regarding the importance of distinguishing between functions and their values.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the traditional notation used in differential equations can lead to confusion, particularly when dealing with functions of multiple variables. There is an acknowledgment of the historical context of this issue in elementary texts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators seeking clarity in the study of differential equations, particularly those interested in the foundational mathematical concepts and notational conventions.

Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
Can anyone recommend an elementary but rigorous text on differential equations that takes care to distinguish between a function, [itex]f: X \rightarrow Y[/itex], and its value [itex]f(x) \in Y[/itex], as Spivak does in his Calculus. I find I'm getting rather confused by the traditional y=y(x) type dual-meaning notation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It seems you already know the difference between a function and a value it takes on. This is a pure math concern and not really the concern of an applied math book like a DE book, which tends to gloss over many math points. At any rate, confusing a function and it's values has a long and fine history, especially in elementary books; it's just something you have to get over. Perhaps you should try reading another book to get a different perspective? Here are two suggestions:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486649407/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486659429/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:


It's my concern because I want to learn the subject and understand it properly. Tenenbaum and Pollard do explain the distinction in their opening chapter, but then switch to a notation that often hides it. It's no problem to me when they're talking about things I'm already familiar with, but when the discussion moves to defining new concepts in terms of functions of multiple variables, which may themselves be functions of other variables, it's not always clear to me what sort of object those variables are. Thanks for the recommendations, though. I'll keep working at it. And Coddington's book is new to me, so I'll certainly give that a look.
 


Thanks for the suggestions, atyy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K