Differential operator acting on scalar fields

shedrick94
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I really cannot seem to be able to follow the logic of how you would use the product rule when using 4 vector differential operator. ∂μ is the differential operator, Aμ is a scalar field and φ and φ* is it's complex conjugate scalar field. I have the answer, I'd just really like to know how to follow the logic of the answer.

Homework Equations


μ(Aμφφ*)=...?

The Attempt at a Solution


Literally have no idea what I'm doing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[itex]A^\mu[/itex] is a vector field, not a scalar field. But what is unclear about the product rule? (Note: I would not use the same index [itex]\mu[/itex] for both [itex]\partial_\mu[/itex] and [itex]A^\mu[/itex]. I would let one of them be [itex]\nu[/itex]. If you really mean for the indices to be equal, then you can set them equal at the end.)

You have a product [itex]A^\nu \phi \phi^*[/itex] you're taking a derivative with respect to [itex]x^\mu[/itex]. So the product rule says:

[itex]\partial_\mu (A^\nu \phi \phi^*) = (\partial_\mu A^\nu) \phi \phi^* + A^\nu (\partial_\mu \phi) \phi^* + A^\nu \phi (\partial_\mu \phi^*)[/itex]
 
Yeh sorry I did mean to put that A is a scalar field. Should be a bit more explicit about the problem I'm having as I wrote that last night after spending almost all my evening on it and I had given up.

Basically the problem is to do with the klein gordon current with an electromagnetic field and part of the current is the below equation and you have to be able to recognize that the product rule expansion of what I've shown on the LHS is the RHS.

\begin{equation}
iq(\phi^{*}A_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\phi + \phi^{*}\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}\phi + \phi A_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\phi^{*} + \phi\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}\phi^{*})=2iq\phi^{*}\phi A_{\mu}
\end{equation}
ie that,
\begin{equation}
\partial_{\mu}(LHS)=\partial_{\mu}(RHS)
\end{equation}

I'm particularly struggling to understand when and where you can move the fields around. For example, are you allow to just move the scalar fields φ and φ* around wherever you please?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K