Differentiating Piecewise Functions

Click For Summary
Differentiating piecewise functions involves analyzing each segment separately and checking points where the derivative does not exist, such as at the boundaries. For the given function, critical points occur at x=0 and x=4, where the function transitions between segments. The local minimum at f(0)=0 is confirmed by examining the behavior of the function around this point, while x=4 is identified as a local maximum. The function does not have absolute minima or maxima due to its behavior as x approaches infinity. Understanding the continuity and differentiability at the boundaries is crucial for accurate analysis.
Sisyphus
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hello Calculus Forum,

I need some help in differentiating piecewise functions and finding local/absolute minimum/maximum values. Problem is, I don't know how. For example, ...[/color]-x , if x<0
f(x)={ 2x^3-15x^2+36x , if 0<x<4, or x=0, or x=4
...[/color] 216-x , if x>4my first inclination is to differentiate each part separately, see where the slopes change in each part, and then calculuate the min/max values using the critical points, but I am not arriving at the correct answers. =\

I can find out the critical points of the middle part pretty easily
(x= 2,x=3), but my answer key also reads that there is a local minimum point at f(0)=0
I really don't have a good idea of how f(0) could be a minimum value, unless it is because x=0 is where the first part of the fuction ends and where the second piece begins, but if I am right in that regard, why isn't x=4 also considered a critical value?

Hope my question makes sense, and so on.

...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sisyphus said:
Hello Calculus Forum,

I need some help in differentiating piecewise functions and finding local/absolute minimum/maximum values. Problem is, I don't know how. For example,


...[/color]-x , if x<0
f(x)={ 2x^3-15x^2+36x , if 0<x<4, or x=0, or x=4
...[/color] 216-x , if x>4


my first inclination is to differentiate each part separately, see where the slopes change in each part, and then calculuate the min/max values using the critical points, but I am not arriving at the correct answers. =\

I can find out the critical points of the middle part pretty easily
(x= 2,x=3), but my answer key also reads that there is a local minimum point at f(0)=0
I really don't have a good idea of how f(0) could be a minimum value, unless it is because x=0 is where the first part of the fuction ends and where the second piece begins, but if I am right in that regard, why isn't x=4 also considered a critical value?

Hope my question makes sense, and so on.

...

There are no critical points "for the middle part"! Remember that a critical may be at a point where the derivative is 0, or where the derivative does not exist. You are given that
f(x)= -x , if x<0
f(x)= 2x^3-15x^2+36x , if 0<x<4, or x=0, or x=4
f(x)= 216-x , if x>4

f'(x)= -1, if x< 0
f'(x)= 6x2-30x+ 36, if 0< x< 4
f'(x)= -1, if x> 4

f'(x) does not exist at x= 0 or 4.

Obviously f' is never 0 for x not between 0 and 4. 6x2- 30x+ 6= 0 is the same as x2- 5x+ 6= (x-6)(x+1) 0 has roots
-1 and 6 which are not between 0 and 4. The only possible local max and min are at 0 and 4!

for x close to 0 but positive, f'(x) is close to 36> 0 so f is increasing to the right of x= 0. On the other hand, for x< 0, f(x)= -x> 0= f(0). Clearly, x= 0 is a local minimum.

for x close to4 but less than 4, f'(x) is close to 24- 120+ 36< 0 so f is decreasing for x< 4. For x> 4 but close to 4, f(x) is close to 212= f(4) but less. Clearly, x= 4 is a local maximum.
 
but isn't 6x^2-30x+36=x^2-5x+6=(x-3)(x-2)

which would place its roots inside the given domain?

In addition, since in the original fuction, the domain of the middle function is "x greater than/equal to 0, less than/equal to 4", wouldn't that mean that x=0 and x=4 are within the parameters of the fuction, which would mean that f'(x) would also be defined at those points?

Thanks a lot for the reply, it's already cleared a lot of things for me. If you could just answer some of my last questions here, that'd be great.

Thanks.
 
You should be abel to see by inspection that as x \to -\infty, f(x) \to \infty, and likewise as x \to \infty, f(x) \to -\infty, so there are no absolute minima or maxima. Sisyphus, you're right, HallsofIvy miscalculated, and on (0,4), f'(x) = 6(x-3)(x-2). So, on (0,4), f''(x) = 12x - 30. f''(2) = -6, and f''(3) = 6, so 2 is a local maximum, and 3 is a local minimum.

Just because f is defined at 0 and 4 doesn't mean f'' is defined there. You should know this. For example, the absolute value function is defined at 0, since |0| = 0, but it has no derivative at 0. So you have to "manually" check the behaviour of the function around 0 and 4.

f(0) = 0, f(4) = 32. It's easy to see that for x < 0 but close to 0, f(x) > 0. For x > 0 but close to 0, f(x) = x(2x² - 15x + 36). x is positive, and since x is small, (2x² - 15x + 36) is approximately 36, i.e. whatever it is, it is positive, so f(x) is positive. So 0 is another local minimum. For x > 4 but close to 4, it's easy to see that f(x) is close to 212 which is greater than f(4) = 32. You can also see that for x < 4 but close to 4, f'(x) is close to 6*4² - 30*4 + 36 = 12 > 0, so f is increasing as it approaches 4 from the left. So 4 is not a local minimum or maximum (because to the right, the f is clearly larger than f(4), and on the left, since f increases as it approaches 4 and f is continuous on [0,4], f must be smaller than f(4)).
 
BTW, the tex for

...-x , if x<0
f(x)={ 2x^3-15x^2+36x , if 0<x<4, or x=0, or x=4
... 216-x , if x>4

is:

f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}-x,&\mbox{ if } x< 0\\2x^3-15x^2+36x , & \mbox{ if } 0\leq x\leq 4 \\216-x, & \mbox{ if }x>4\end{array}\right.

which looks like this:

f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}-x,&amp;\mbox{ if }<br /> x&lt; 0\\2x^3-15x^2+36x , &amp; \mbox{ if } 0\leq x\leq 4 \\216-x, &amp; \mbox{ if }x&gt;4\end{array}\right.
 
Recall that the derivative of a function, say f(x), at a point x=a is given by

f^{\prime} (a) = \lim_{x\rightarrow a} \frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a}

which exists if and only if the left- and right-hand limits exist and are equal so that for the above function

f_+^{\prime} (0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^+} \frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0} = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^+} \frac{(2x^3-15x^2+36x) -0}{x-0}= \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^+} 2x^2-15x+36 = 36

but

f_-^{\prime} (0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^-} \frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0} = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^-} \frac{(-x) -0}{x-0}= \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^-} -1=-1

so that f^{\prime}(0) does not exist, note that f_{-}^{\prime}(a)\mbox{ and }f_{+}^{\prime}(a) are called the left- and right-hand derivatives of f(x) at x=a (and, if equal, are then equal to the derivative f^{\prime}(a), similar to left- and right-hand limits).

Try calculating the left- and right-hand derivatives of f(x) at x=4.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K