Differentiation of Vector Fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differentiation of vector fields, specifically addressing the relationship between two vector fields X and Y and their adjoint curves. The problem involves demonstrating that if the inner product of the adjoint curve p(t) and vector field Y is zero, then the inner product of p(t) and the Lie bracket [Y, X] is also zero. The solution approach includes differentiating the inner product and applying the properties of vector fields, particularly the adjointness and the Lie bracket definition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with Lie brackets and adjoint curves
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces in the context of differential equations
  • Proficiency in differentiating vector fields and applying the product rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie brackets in vector calculus
  • Learn about adjoint curves and their applications in differential equations
  • Explore the implications of self-adjoint vector fields in mathematical physics
  • Investigate the role of inner products in the analysis of vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying differential geometry or dynamical systems who are interested in the properties and applications of vector fields and their interactions.

Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let X,Y be vector fields and x(t) be a curve satisfying
\dot x(t) = X(x(t)) + u(t) Y(x(t)), u(t) \in \mathbb R [/itex]<br /> and assume there exists p(t) an adjoint curve satisfying<br /> \dot p(t) = -p(t) \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial x}(x(t)) + u(t) \frac{\partial Y}{\partial x} (x(t)) \right)<br /> If \langle p(t), Y(x(t)) \rangle = 0 show that \langle p(t), [Y,X](x(t)) \rangle = 0<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> This should be done by differentiating. I get that<br /> \begin{align*}&lt;br /&gt; \frac{d}{dt} \langle p(t), Y(x(t)) \rangle &amp;amp;= \langle \partial_t p(t), Y(x(t)) \rangle + \langle p(t) \partial_x Y(x(t)) \partial_t x(t) \rangle \\&lt;br /&gt; &amp;amp;= \langle -p \left( \partial_x X +u \partial_x Y\right), Y \rangle + \langle p,\partial_xY ( X + u Y) \rangle \end{align*}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t see how this simplifies.<br /> <br /> Edit: Where we&#039;re taking [A,B] = (\partial_x A)B - (\partial_x B)A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It works if the vector fields are somehow self-adjoint, but I have no reason to believe that this should be true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K