Difficulty level of upper div physics classes?

AI Thread Summary
A third-year student, currently majoring in geology, expresses concern about falling behind in physics coursework and contemplates whether to combine classical mechanics with advanced vector calculus and differential equations. The student feels overwhelmed and questions their ability to pursue physics due to their current academic standing. Responses emphasize the importance of following the correct course sequence, advising against combining these subjects prematurely, as it could lead to further difficulties. Additionally, the discussion reassures the student that being behind does not preclude success in physics, especially after switching majors, and encourages persistence in their studies.
ThugFish
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this is off-topic for this section of the forum but I wasn't sure where else to post it.

I'm substantially behind compared to other physics majors at the moment (3rd year student with enough credits to be considered mid 4th year student) so i wanted to pick up the pace. I like physics a lot but personally I don't feel like I can do physics anymore because of how behind I am already. I've only taken the easier calc based intro physics classes (because I wasn't originally a physics major and the harder intro classes were basically only for physics/engineering majors). Also I haven't taken the 2nd half of vector calc (double/triple int, surface/line int, green/stokes/divergence theorem) and I haven't taken differential equations yet either.

Would it be a good idea trying to combine first half of classical mech with 2nd half of vector calc and differential equations together? I feel like it would probably be overwhelming but that's why I am asking.

My major is currently geology but I really don't like it because its not quantitative enough for me and also i hate doing field work, id rather be doing office/lab work.

My other choices would be to do either environmental science or applied mathematics.

Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ThugFish said:
Also I haven't taken the 2nd half of vector calc (double/triple int, surface/line int, green/stokes/divergence theorem) and I haven't taken differential equations yet either.

Would it be a good idea trying to combine first half of classical mech with 2nd half of vector calc and differential equations together?

No. You need to take classes in the proper sequence, or you will get even more behind.
 
As Vanadium said, you really need to take vector calculus before you even think about classical mechanics.

Secondly, just because you are behind doesn't mean you "can't do physics anymore". If you just switched majors, you can't expect to be at the same level as everyone who has been doing physics all along. You will get there eventually.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top