Diffraction grating experiment

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
m_p_w
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I did an experiment where a red laser went through a diffraction grating
The distance between the diffraction grating to the screen is 10cm (x)
Later I measure the distance from the central dot to the first dot (4.5cm) (y)
after this I measure the distance from the central dot to the second dot(13.1cm) (y)

I used this formula to calculate the wavelength of the red laser: d*tan(y/x) = m λ
where m = 0,1,2... and d = 1.67*10^-6 in this experiment.

The problem which I've got is that I got two different wavelengths for the same red laser
692.4nm and 765.6nm.
My question is this, should I add these two wavelengths and then divide it by two to get the "average" wavelength or should I just say in the experiment that the wavelength "765.6nm" is a random error; thus, we should not take it to the consideration?
 
on Phys.org
any one please, if this is a stupid question then please tell me
 
m_p_w said:
I did an experiment where a red laser went through a diffraction grating
The distance between the diffraction grating to the screen is 10cm (x)
Later I measure the distance from the central dot to the first dot (4.5cm) (y)
after this I measure the distance from the central dot to the second dot(13.1cm) (y)

I used this formula to calculate the wavelength of the red laser: d*tan(y/x) = m λ
where m = 0,1,2... and d = 1.67*10^-6 in this experiment.

The problem which I've got is that I got two different wavelengths for the same red laser
692.4nm and 765.6nm.
My question is this, should I add these two wavelengths and then divide it by two to get the "average" wavelength or should I just say in the experiment that the wavelength "765.6nm" is a random error; thus, we should not take it to the consideration?

The equation you quoted is wrong. The correct equation is d sinθ = mλ.

What you did was to replace sinθ by tanθ=y/x, so you calculated the wavelength from the formula d y/x = mλ. But sinθ can be approximated by tanθ only for small angles, that is, when y<<x. That was not valid in your experiment. Find θ=arctan(y/x), and use the formula d sinθ = mλ to get the wavelength.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person