Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Diffraction vs interference

  1. Jul 28, 2009 #1

    KFC

    User Avatar

    I am reading texts on fundamental physics about diffraction and interference. When comes to diffraction, it takes a single slit as example and using Huygen's principle to explain how the wave transmitt and form the pattern. It sounds like that the pattern is due to interference. One textbook even said that "there is no fundamentaldistinction b/w interference and diffraction ..." It is really confues

    1) if there is no difference, why using different terms?
    2) whem comes to a pinhole, can I say the resulting airy discs are also come from interference?
    3) in Bragg diffraction (2D case), it is all about interference b/w reflected waves, why still call it "diffraction"?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 28, 2009 #2

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You could say diffraction is caused by interference.
    I would probably be happy dropping the term diffraction completely and just using interference everywhere.
     
  4. Jul 28, 2009 #3

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    One way to think about diffraction is the resultant interference between different spatial modes of the total field. So conceptually, there is no real distinction.

    In practice, "interference" usually refers to how a single mode interferes with itself (Mach-Zender interferometers, Young interferometers, etc), while "diffraction" usually refers to the more general case (e.g. diffraction by an aperture)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Diffraction vs interference
Loading...