Diffraction vs interference

  • Thread starter KFC
  • Start date
  • #1
KFC
488
4
I am reading texts on fundamental physics about diffraction and interference. When comes to diffraction, it takes a single slit as example and using Huygen's principle to explain how the wave transmitt and form the pattern. It sounds like that the pattern is due to interference. One textbook even said that "there is no fundamentaldistinction b/w interference and diffraction ..." It is really confues

1) if there is no difference, why using different terms?
2) whem comes to a pinhole, can I say the resulting airy discs are also come from interference?
3) in Bragg diffraction (2D case), it is all about interference b/w reflected waves, why still call it "diffraction"?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mgb_phys
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,774
13
You could say diffraction is caused by interference.
I would probably be happy dropping the term diffraction completely and just using interference everywhere.
 
  • #3
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
7,510
2,081
One way to think about diffraction is the resultant interference between different spatial modes of the total field. So conceptually, there is no real distinction.

In practice, "interference" usually refers to how a single mode interferes with itself (Mach-Zender interferometers, Young interferometers, etc), while "diffraction" usually refers to the more general case (e.g. diffraction by an aperture)
 

Related Threads on Diffraction vs interference

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
830
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
47K
Top