Diffractive optics and achromaticism

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Beer-monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
Hi

I've been resarching interference lithography and have read on wikipedia, and some more reputable sources, that if diffractive optics are used to split the beam and/or focus the beam onto the screen (surface) the temperal coherence of the light source is no longer an issue. i.e. the output light is achromatic.

However, I'm not sure I understand why?

Does it have something to do with the diffraction grating acting almost like a prism, dispersing the light so that waves along a specific angle and path are of one frequency and phase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this .pdf from a company that researches EUV lithography.

http://lmn.web.psi.ch/xil/xil_pres.pdf

On page 9, they mention that using diffraction optics removes the need for strict temporal coherence from the formation of the interference pattern.

I'm just not sure why the should be so?
 
Thanks- that helps.

I wonder if it's just a poor choice of words; the diagram shows something similar to a Young's double slit interferometer: the diffraction gratings could be used to select out a particular wavelength by using high orders, but that means the temporal coherence of the etching light is high. Of course, the original source (synchotron) has a low temporal coherence, but from what I gather on the diagram that doesn't matter since the gratings act to spectrally filter the light.

Maybe I am not understanding the brochure... I'll keep reading.