Digesting Pollens: Can We Benefit from Supplements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suraj M
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the digestibility and nutritional value of pollen grains as dietary supplements. Participants explore the claims surrounding pollen's benefits, the regulatory landscape of dietary supplements, and the methods of processing pollen for human consumption.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that pollen grains are used as food supplements, while others question the validity of these claims.
  • Concerns are raised about the indigestibility of sporopollenin and how pollen can be processed for human consumption.
  • One participant highlights the lack of regulation in the dietary supplement industry, suggesting that the presence of pollen in supplements does not guarantee efficacy.
  • Another participant mentions the nutritional value of pollen as taught in educational materials, indicating a belief in its benefits.
  • Methods for making pollen digestible, such as extensive chewing or blending, are discussed, along with the concept of bioavailability and its implications for nutrient absorption.
  • Historical and scientific perspectives on pollen's resistance to digestion and its role in palynology are introduced, emphasizing its longevity and significance in climate studies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the digestibility and benefits of pollen, with no consensus reached on its efficacy as a dietary supplement. Some participants support its nutritional claims, while others remain skeptical.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference educational materials and personal experiences, but there is a lack of specific scientific studies or data to substantiate claims about pollen's digestibility and nutritional value.

Suraj M
Gold Member
Messages
596
Reaction score
39
They say that Pollen grains are used as food supplements.
But the sporopollenin is practically indigestible. So then how are these pollens grains digested in our intestines?
Are they processed before consumption?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Suraj M said:
They say that Pollen grains are used as food supplements.

Who says?
 
I meant there are food supplements of pollen grains
It's there in our textbooks and in stores :-)
 
Last edited:
Huh. I had no idea. :biggrin:
 
At least in the US, most dietary supplements are basically unregulated:
  • Federal law does not require dietary supplements to be proven safe to FDA's satisfaction before they are marketed.
  • For most claims made in the labeling of dietary supplements, the law does not require the manufacturer or seller to prove to FDA's satisfaction that the claim is accurate or truthful before it appears on the product.
(http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm050803.htm)

So, just because some people use it as a dietary supplement does not mean that it is actually doing anything.
 
I don't know if that was suppose to answer my question.
We were taught that pollens are highly nutritious and hence used as supplements.
 
I can barely find anything on google, as I have to wade through a million webpages extolling the virtues of bee pollen as a miraculous superfood. Which makes me seriously suspect about any benefits of pollen. Can I ask what textbook(s) you are using?
 
It's by the NCERT- it's the book by the central board of education for the whole country
+ modules my tutorials give
 
If you physically rupture pollen grains, then, yes, there are human digestible nutrients inside. For example, extensive chewing, a blender, or some cooking methods can do this more or less efficiently. I'm not in any way recommending the stuff.

In fact, there are a lot of small insects and other arthropods that feed only on pollen. The whole topic of being hard/easy to digest is called bioavailability, which you can read about now that you have the search term. This is a really interesting topic, BTW. Bioavailability of some nutrients changes with ageing in humans. Old guys like me secrete less stomach acid than young people. A plant with tiny lithocysts of calcium, say eaten raw, provides less calcium per unit volume for old folks versus young folks. There is less acid in the gut to help break down the lithocysts. And there is a disparity between the amount of calcium required in the diet, versus what your body actually needs and uses. I'm too lazy to get a reference with good numbers, but, the recommended daily value for calcium in the US diet is greater than the calcium actively untilized - for all ages. Because of bioavailbility.

Pollen is remarkably resistant. Palynology is based on the fact that the enzymes to break down pollen walls are not ubiquitous in nature. For example, lake bottoms have lovely, pretty much yearly varves made of pollen and sediment. These persist for very long periods of time. Fossil pollen from them is very important for getting information on local climate at the time of the deposition of the pollen.

Pollen and spores (the forerunners of modern Angiosperm pollen) can be old, as in Silurian age. See the picture of Silurian plant spores (modern plants were not around then).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palynology
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Oh okay thanks a lot [emoji1]
So indigestible but not impossible to get through the exile. Okay [emoji4]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K