MHB Dilution of a Solution Strengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter frgeorgeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dilution
AI Thread Summary
To create 6mg and 12mg solutions from 0mg and 18mg strengths, the correct mixing ratios are 2/3 of the 0mg solution and 1/3 of the 18mg solution for the 6mg strength, and 1/3 of the 0mg solution and 2/3 of the 18mg solution for the 12mg strength. The calculations confirm that for a 30ml bottle of 12mg, 20ml should come from the 18mg solution and 10ml from the 0mg solution. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between volume and strength in solution mixing. The original poster acknowledges a tendency to overthink the math involved in these calculations. Overall, the mixing process is clarified through straightforward ratios.
frgeorgeh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to mix 4 strengths of solutions. I thought to save time I would mix 1 a 0mg strength and a second at 18mg strength. How do I use those two solutions to make a 6mg, 12 mg strength solution?

The ratio of (OV)*(OS)=(NV)*(NS) where OV=Old Volume, OS=Old Strength,, NV=New Volume, NS=New Strength, does not work since I know all the results. For example, if I wanted to make the following:

I have: 1 gal (3,785ml) of 0mg and 1gal of 18mg

I want to make: 30ml bottles at 6mg and 12mg.

I hope this makes sense.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
frgeorgeh said:
I want to mix 4 strengths of solutions. I thought to save time I would mix 1 a 0mg strength and a second at 18mg strength. How do I use those two solutions to make a 6mg, 12 mg strength solution?

The ratio of (OV)*(OS)=(NV)*(NS) where OV=Old Volume, OS=Old Strength,, NV=New Volume, NS=New Strength, does not work since I know all the results. For example, if I wanted to make the following:

I have: 1 gal (3,785ml) of 0mg and 1gal of 18mg

I want to make: 30ml bottles at 6mg and 12mg.

I hope this makes sense.

Thanks

__________________________________

OK, I think I am over thinking this. It seems to me, to get a 6mg strength, I add 2/3 of the 0MG and 1/3 of the 18mg. To get 12mg, I add 1/3 0mg and 2/3 of 18mg. What do u think?
 
I am assuming the solution strengths are in milligrams per milliliters. So, if you have a solution with a strength of $18$, to get a solution of volume $V$ with a strength of $18k$, where:

$$0\le k\le1$$

You would need to use $$kV$$ of the solution of strength $18$, with the rest consisting of the strength $0$ solution.

For example, since 12 is 2/3 of 18, then you would put 2/3 of 30 mL which is 20 mL with 10 mL of strength 0 to get 30 mL of strength 12.

So yes, your reasoning is correct. :D
 
MarkFL said:
I am assuming the solution strengths are in milligrams per milliliters. So, if you have a solution with a strength of $18$, to get a solution of volume $V$ with a strength of $18k$, where:

Thanks for the reply! I am an Engineer but always seem to over complicate my math.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
42K
Replies
48
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
78
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top