Can Physics Equations Be Visualized as Geometric Shapes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thedy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
AI Thread Summary
Dimensions in physics relate to the ratio of sets of units, often analyzed through dimensional analysis. This concept allows for the visualization of equations, such as representing distance as a rectangle using the formula s = v*t. The Cartesian product is a mathematical approach that helps visualize dimensions and composite structures, like cylinders and donuts. This method is widely used in modern mathematics to explore abstract concepts. The discussion highlights the intersection of physics and geometry in understanding dimensions.
thedy
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hi,I m thinking about,what is dimension meaning in physics.Is it any analogy with square or cube,for example?Let have for example the simplest example,distance:s=v*t.Can I draw this equation like rectangle object?Like in geometry,we have for rectangle equation a*b,now we have v*t.I know,it is totally non-sense question,but I m interesting in it.
Does physicists use this view on stuff?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey thedy and welcome to the forums.

Typically a dimension in things like physics, engineering, and science (as opposed to mathematics) concerns the ratio of sets of units. In general you have a ratio of two units and those units are basically made up of multiplying other sub-units together.

The area for this is dimensional analysis and you can think of it like where each dimension is either a completely independent unit or can be considered as a function of other units: you use the same sort of ideas that you use in algebra to simplify units.

If you want to consider this kind of thing in mathematics, probably the best place to start is to look at the Cartesian product and how it is defined and visualized for various sets.

In fact what you are describing is not at all weird and the idea is used everywhere in mathematics when creating composite structures.

For example if you want to create a cylinder what you do is create something like T X R where T is a circle and R is a real line. You can also create a donut by using T X T.

This idea of creating new stuff like this is at the heart of modern mathematics when considering how to deal with very abstract ways of doing this kind of thing.
 
chiro said:
Hey thedy and welcome to the forums.

Typically a dimension in things like physics, engineering, and science (as opposed to mathematics) concerns the ratio of sets of units. In general you have a ratio of two units and those units are basically made up of multiplying other sub-units together.

The area for this is dimensional analysis and you can think of it like where each dimension is either a completely independent unit or can be considered as a function of other units: you use the same sort of ideas that you use in algebra to simplify units.

If you want to consider this kind of thing in mathematics, probably the best place to start is to look at the Cartesian product and how it is defined and visualized for various sets.

In fact what you are describing is not at all weird and the idea is used everywhere in mathematics when creating composite structures.

For example if you want to create a cylinder what you do is create something like T X R where T is a circle and R is a real line. You can also create a donut by using T X T.

This idea of creating new stuff like this is at the heart of modern mathematics when considering how to deal with very abstract ways of doing this kind of thing.

Hi,thanks for answer,I think,I found what I was looking for in your answer
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top