Dimensional analysis universal gravitation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the SI units of the gravitational constant G in Newton's law of universal gravitation, the equation F = GMm/r^2 is rearranged to G = Fr^2/(Mm). The units of force (F) are expressed as newtons (N), which equals kg·m/s². By substituting the units into the equation for G, it simplifies to m³/(kg·s²). The final result confirms that the units of G are indeed m³/kg·s², aligning with the answer provided in the textbook. The discussion also touches on using LaTeX for mathematical formatting.
suetonius
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Firstly, I admit that my math skills are fairly rusty. I also admit that this is a homework problem. It is not to be turned in for a grade however.
The problem is to determine the SI units of G in the following equation:

F = GMm/r^2

(where F is force (mass * acceleration), M and m are the masses of two objects, and r is a distance)
which is, of course, Newton's law of universal gravitation.
I would be greatly appreciative if someone could walk through the steps needed to make this determination.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work it out for G:

F = G\frac{{m_1 \cdot m_2 }}{{r^2 }} \Leftrightarrow G = \frac{{F \cdot r^2 }}{{m_1 \cdot m_2 }}

I suppose you now the units of the RHS, LHS has to be equal :smile:
 
Thanks for that. The answer in the back of the book is quite different, however. It is given as m^3/kg*s^2. I'm working on it. Do you think you could go into more detail? Again, my skills are a little rusty. Also, how'd you get the math font into your message?
 
I just worked it out for G. Now you have to replace the right hand side by all their units and simplify to find the unit of G.
 
1N = kg \frac {m}{s^2}
for font (LaTex) read first threads in General Physics forum :smile:

edit: where 1N is unit of force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top