I was looking at a paper that used dimensional regularization and the following expression was derived:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\int dx \mbox{ }[p^2(1-x)^2-\lambda^2(1-x)]^{\epsilon} [/tex]

Factoring out [tex]p^2(1-x)^2 [/tex]:

[tex]\int dx \mbox{ }[p^2(1-x)^2]^{\epsilon}[1-\frac{\lambda^2}{p^2(1-x)}]^{\epsilon} [/tex]

The part that I don't understand is that they expanded the rightmost factor in binomial expansion. [tex]\lambda^2[/tex] is smaller than [tex]p^2 [/tex] (in fact [tex]\lambda^2=p^2-m^2 [/tex]), but the 1/(1-x) changes all that when x approaches 1, making [tex]\frac{\lambda^2}{p^2(1-x)} [/tex] much greater than 1.

Is it okay to expand the rightmost factor in binomial expansion because when x goes to 1, the factor on the left [tex][p^2(1-x)^2]^{\epsilon} [/tex] goes to zero, so it doesn't matter what's on the rightmost side at that point? If so, isn't there an error term that needs to be calculated?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dimensional regularization

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**