Dimensionally corect equation ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter star20
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dimensional correctness of the equation X = 1/2 at^3. Participants clarify that in dimensional analysis, scalar coefficients like 1/2 are dimensionless and can be ignored. The equation simplifies to checking if [L] = [L]/[T]^2 * [T]^3 holds true, which it does. Thus, the equation is dimensionally correct. The focus is on understanding that only the dimensions matter in this context.
star20
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



-------------Dimension------------------...
distance (x) (L) Acceleration (a) (L)/(T)^2

Time (t)-----> (T) Force (F)-----> (M)(L)/(T)^2

Mass (m)----> (M) Energy (E)-----> (M)(L)^2/(T)^2

Speed (v)-----> (L)/(T)
Is the following equation dimensionally correct?
A) X= 1/2 at^3

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



A) X= 1/2 at^3
[L] = 1/2 [L]/[T]^2 * [T]^3

i know my proff said numbers such as 1/2 don't have dimension but i don't really understand how to solve this...what am i suppsoed 2 do with 1/2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF Star20,

QUOTE=star20;1867892]

A) X= 1/2 at^3
[L] = 1/2 [L]/[T]^2 * [T]^3

i know my proff said numbers such as 1/2 don't have dimension but i don't really understand how to solve this...what am i suppsoed 2 do with 1/2[/QUOTE]
Scalar coefficients are irrelevant in dimensional analysis, only the dimensions themselves are important, you can safely ignore the fact of 1/2.
 
Drop the (1/2). It doesn't have any dimensions.
 
ok thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top