Dipole Electric Field Drop: Understanding 1/r^3 Decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of the electric field generated by a dipole, specifically its decay rate of 1/r^3 at large distances. Although the two equal and opposite charges in a dipole might seem to cancel each other out, the differing distances from a point in the field lead to a net electric field that decreases more rapidly than a single point charge. The close proximity of the charges alters the standard field equations, allowing for the approximation of the dipole as a single entity in the far field. Mathematical derivations show that when applying the cosine law and considering the geometry of the dipole, the potential leads to a force that indeed behaves as 1/r^3. This understanding clarifies the seemingly paradoxical nature of dipole fields at large distances.
staetualex
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hy, i am back with my annoying questions about this and that. Could everyone tell me why the frigging dipole have an electric field that drops with 1/r^3? i mean, if i am far away , i should feel no electric field, you know, q2 = -q1 , so they cancel, but i feel (q1 q2 k)/r^3.What the HECK?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Why do you say "you know, q_2 = q_1 , so they cancel"? The field due to one pole depends on 1/r2 and the two distances are not the same so while q_2- q_1= 0, q_2/r_2^2- q_1/r_1^2] is not 0. It true that because of the equal charges in the denominator, that will drop off faster than just 1/r^2- which is exactly what 1/r^3 does.
 


well, dipole have 2 charges equal but opposite. if i am far away, and i am a proton, i feel the force of a charge pushing me with a force equal x, but i also feel a force attracting me also of x magnitude. but the dipole's formula states that i should feel q1 x q2 x k divided by distance cubed. I am confused
 
HallsofIvy already explained it pretty well. The close proximity of the opposite charges changes the normal field equation. In the near field, we take the summation of the fields from the two charges, but in the far-field, the two charges can be approximated as a single dipole moment. This simplifies the math and introduces little error, the cancellation effect is shown in the fact that the dipole moment drops off as 1/r^3 here instead of 1/r^2.
 
Consider the potential (just take the gradient (times -1) to get the force):

V(r)=kq(\frac{1}{r_{+}}-\frac{1}{r_{-}} if we apply cosine law and take d as the distance between the two charges and r as the distance from the point exactly between the two charges to somewhere in the distance we get r_{\pm}^2=r^2+(\frac{d}{2})^2+2 r d cos \theta / 2 = r^2(1+\frac{d}{r}cos \theta + \frac{d^2}{4r^2}) now if r is much greater than d then we neglect the d^2/r^2 term and get (with some reworking) \frac{1}{r_{\pm}}=\frac{1}{r}(1 \pm \frac{d}{2r}cos \theta) so we have \frac{1}{r_{+}}-\frac{1}{r_{-}}\approx \frac{d}{r^2}cos \theta so, finally, we have in the limit that r >> d V(r) is approximately qk\frac{cos \theta}{r^2}. Take the grad of that and you have a 1/r^3 relation.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top