I Do Polarized Atoms Imply Shifted Electron Orbitals?

Getterdog
Messages
83
Reaction score
6
When neutral atoms become polarized from ambient EM radiation, does this automatically imply that electrons have shifted orbitals,or do they remain in the same levels but become deformed? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to know how orbitals behave when an extern Electric or Magnetic field is present, then search for Stark and Zeeman effect. There are a lot of youtube videos
 
Last edited:
Getterdog said:
When neutral atoms become polarized from ambient EM radiation, does this automatically imply that electrons have shifted orbitals,or do they remain in the same levels but become deformed? Thanks
It depends on which orbitals/levels you are talking about. If you are talking about the field-free states, than an external field leads to a superposition of these states. In other words, the polarised orbitals are linear combinations of the field-free orbitals.

At the same time, one can take the polarised orbitals as eigenstates of the Hamiltonian that includes the external field.

Usually, the first case is considered as external fields are usually weak and a perturbative approach is used.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top