Dirac brackets and gauge in special relativity.

raul.cuesta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
It's well known that the action for a relativistic point particle is:
<br /> S=-m\int d\tau\left(-\dot{x}^2\right)^{1/2}<br />
the canonical momentum is

<br /> p_{\mu}= \frac{m\dot{x}_{\mu}}{\left(-\dot{x}^2\right)^{1/2}}.<br />

This action is invariant under reparametrizations of \tau, then its canonical Hamiltonian vanishes and we have a primary constraint of first class:
<br /> \varphi_1=p^{2}+m^{2}\approx 0.<br />

Then, in order to eliminate all arbitrary funtions of the system we can use the gauge freedom in the action, this is done by imposing a second constraint \varphi_2 such that \varphi_1 becomes second class and now we can use the Dirac brackets to work out the problem.

My question is: Is it valid if I ask the Dirac brackets to be

<br /> \left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=\eta^{\mu\nu},<br />
<br /> \left\{x^{\mu},x^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=\left\{p^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=0,<br />

and then I try to find the conditions on \varphi_2 and finally work with this brackets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, actually the form of the Dirac brackets is always derived, either for a first class or second class constrained system. See more on this matter in Henneaux's book. And btw, the free relativistic particle is easier to study/quantize in the einbein formulation.
 
Hello again,
I know how to calculate the Dirac brackets, my question is about the gauge fixation. Normaly we choose the form of the constraint \varphi_2 and then we calculate the Dirac brackets. What I want to know, is if this is valid:
1.-Impose the Dirac brackets to be:
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=\eta^{\mu\nu}
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=0
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=0,
2.-Find restrictions over a posible second-class constraint \varphi_2 in order to obtain the above brackets. For example:
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=\eta^{\mu\nu}=\eta^{\mu\nu}-\left\{x^{\mu},\varphi_{a}\right\}C^{-1}_{ab}\left\{\varphi_{b},p^{\nu}\right\},
where a,b=1,2, this is true if:
p^{\mu}\left\{p^{2},\varphi_2\right\}\left\{\varphi_2,p^{\nu}\right\}=0,
3.-Maybe find who is \varphi_2 and/or simply work the theory with the brackets in 1.

Greetings!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Back
Top