Dirac brackets and gauge in special relativity.

raul.cuesta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
It's well known that the action for a relativistic point particle is:
<br /> S=-m\int d\tau\left(-\dot{x}^2\right)^{1/2}<br />
the canonical momentum is

<br /> p_{\mu}= \frac{m\dot{x}_{\mu}}{\left(-\dot{x}^2\right)^{1/2}}.<br />

This action is invariant under reparametrizations of \tau, then its canonical Hamiltonian vanishes and we have a primary constraint of first class:
<br /> \varphi_1=p^{2}+m^{2}\approx 0.<br />

Then, in order to eliminate all arbitrary funtions of the system we can use the gauge freedom in the action, this is done by imposing a second constraint \varphi_2 such that \varphi_1 becomes second class and now we can use the Dirac brackets to work out the problem.

My question is: Is it valid if I ask the Dirac brackets to be

<br /> \left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=\eta^{\mu\nu},<br />
<br /> \left\{x^{\mu},x^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=\left\{p^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_{D}=0,<br />

and then I try to find the conditions on \varphi_2 and finally work with this brackets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, actually the form of the Dirac brackets is always derived, either for a first class or second class constrained system. See more on this matter in Henneaux's book. And btw, the free relativistic particle is easier to study/quantize in the einbein formulation.
 
Hello again,
I know how to calculate the Dirac brackets, my question is about the gauge fixation. Normaly we choose the form of the constraint \varphi_2 and then we calculate the Dirac brackets. What I want to know, is if this is valid:
1.-Impose the Dirac brackets to be:
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=\eta^{\mu\nu}
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=0
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=0,
2.-Find restrictions over a posible second-class constraint \varphi_2 in order to obtain the above brackets. For example:
\left\{x^{\mu},p^{\nu}\right\}_D=\eta^{\mu\nu}=\eta^{\mu\nu}-\left\{x^{\mu},\varphi_{a}\right\}C^{-1}_{ab}\left\{\varphi_{b},p^{\nu}\right\},
where a,b=1,2, this is true if:
p^{\mu}\left\{p^{2},\varphi_2\right\}\left\{\varphi_2,p^{\nu}\right\}=0,
3.-Maybe find who is \varphi_2 and/or simply work the theory with the brackets in 1.

Greetings!
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top