A Dirac Delta and Residue Calculus

Daniel Gallimore
Messages
48
Reaction score
17
I'm an undergraduate student, so I understand that it may be difficult to provide an answer that I can understand, but I have experience using both the Dirac delta function and residue calculus in a classroom setting, so I'm at least familiar with how they're applied.

Whether you're integrating along a closed loop around a singularity in the complex plane or you're integrating on a closed sphere in 3D space about a Dirac delta (like you might do in E&M), the value of the integral depends entirely on the point where the singularity/delta is located. Do these similarities betray a connection between the Dirac delta and residue calculus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daniel Gallimore said:
I'm an undergraduate student, so I understand that it may be difficult to provide an answer that I can understand, but I have experience using both the Dirac delta function and residue calculus in a classroom setting, so I'm at least familiar with how they're applied.

Whether you're integrating along a closed loop around a singularity in the complex plane or you're integrating on a closed sphere in 3D space about a Dirac delta (like you might do in E&M), the value of the integral depends entirely on the point where the singularity/delta is located. Do these similarities betray a connection between the Dirac delta and residue calculus?

Well, I would say that there is a closer connection between residues and the Heaviside function H(x) defined as follows:

H(x) = 0 if x < 0
H(x) = 1 if x > 0

Then an integral representation of H(x) is:

H(x) = lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{1}{\tau -i \epsilon} e^{ix\tau} d\tau

which you can prove using residues.

H(x) is related to the delta-function by formally taking the derivative of this integral representation with respect to x:

\delta(x) \equiv \frac{dH}{dx} = lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{i \tau}{\tau -i \epsilon} e^{ix\tau} d\tau
= \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{ix\tau} d\tau
 
It is hard to encounter adequate understanding of the distributions concept in physical textbooks.
Try
KöSaku Yosida. Functional Analysis. Sixth Edition. Springer-Verlag. Berlin Heidelberg New York 1980
 
stevendaryl said:
is related to the delta-function by formally taking the derivative of this integral representation with respect to xx:

δ(x)≡dHdx=limϵ→012πi∫+∞−∞iττ−iϵeixτdτ\delta(x) \equiv \frac{dH}{dx} = lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{i \tau}{\tau -i \epsilon} e^{ix\tau} d\tau
=12π∫+∞−∞eixτdτ
it just remains to explain what this divergent integral means and in which sense the limit ##\epsilon\to 0## is understood
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top