Dirac Delta Function: Integral at x=a

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the Dirac delta function, particularly in the context of integrals involving the delta function at specific points. Participants are examining whether the integral of the delta function can yield the same result when the argument is negated.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the Dirac delta function's definition and its behavior under transformations. Questions arise regarding the validity of certain integral expressions and the conditions under which they hold true.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the properties of the Dirac delta function, with some participants providing insights into its definition and implications. Multiple interpretations of the integral expressions are being discussed, but no consensus has been reached regarding the equivalence of the integrals in question.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of generalized functions and the specific conditions required for the properties of the Dirac delta function to apply. There are indications of confusion regarding variable substitutions and the implications of changing symbols in the context of the delta function.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


int[d(x-a)f(x)dx]=f(a) is the dirac delta fn

but is int[d(a-x)f(x)]=f(a) as well? If so why?

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it because at x=a, d(0)=infinite and integrate dirac delta over a region including x=0 when d(0) is in the value in the integral will produce 1 hence f(a).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it this way.

Since
\int f(x) d(a-x) = -\int f(x) d(x-a) = -f(a) your asking is f(a)=-f(a).
 
pivoxa15 said:

Homework Statement


int[d(x-a)f(x)dx]=f(a) is the dirac delta fn

but is int[d(a-x)f(x)]=f(a) as well? If so why?
No, \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta (a- x)f(x)dx= -f(a). Use the substitution u= a-x.


The Attempt at a Solution


Is it because at x=a, d(0)=infinite and integrate dirac delta over a region including x=0 when d(0) is in the value in the integral will produce 1 hence f(a).
That's a very rough way of putting it. More correctly the dirac delta function (actually a "generalized function" or "distribution") is DEFINED by the property that \int \delta(x) f(x)dx = f(0) as long as the integration include x= 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So it can be but in some cases it is not.
 
Yup, choose your a.
 
is it possible to explain step by step including the integration of the following:

(1) f(x) d(x-a) = f(a) d(x-a)

(2) \int f(a) d(a-x) = f(x)

Thank you,..!
 
Are you changing symbols here? does "d(x-a)" still mean the delta function? Are you asking why
(1) \int f(x)\delta(x- a)dx= \int f(a)\delta(x-a)dx?

That is because the definition of \delta(x-a) require that the
\int f(x)\delta(x-a)dx= f(a)
for any function f as long as the integral of integration includes x= a.
Of course,
\int f(a)\delta(x-a) dx= f(a)\int \delta(x-a)dx= f(a)(1)= f(a)

As for
(2)\int f(a)d(a- x) dx= f(x)
That's not true. In fact,the right hand side cannot be a function of x at all. The integral is just as in (1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K