Dirac Delta using periodic functions

SisypheanZealot
Messages
9
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Exercise1.3: Using the periodic form (1.14) for the Dirac delta, show
$$\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx\:f(x)\delta(x-y)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}f(y+2nL)$$
Relevant Equations
$$\delta(x-y)=\frac{1}{2L}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\lbrace sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L})sin(\frac{n\pi y}{L})+cos(\frac{n\pi x}{L})cos(\frac{n\pi y}{L})\rbrace$$
I know it is something simple that I am missing, but for the life of me I am stuck. So, I used the identity ##sin(a)sin(b)+cos(a)cos(b)=cos(a-b)## which gives me $$\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx\:f(x)\delta(x-y)=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx\:f(x)\frac{1}{2L}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\lbrace sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L})sin(\frac{n\pi y}{L})+cos(\frac{n\pi x}{L})cos(\frac{n\pi y}{L})\rbrace$$ $$=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx\:f(x)\frac{1}{2L}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}cos(\frac{n\pi}{L}(x-y))$$ Then I performed the transformation ##u=\frac{\pi}{L}(x-y)## giving $$=\frac{1}{2L}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\frac{L}{\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}du\:f(u\frac{L}{\pi}+y)cos(u\cdot n)$$ $$=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}du\:f(u\frac{L}{\pi}+y)\frac{1}{2\pi}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}cos(u\cdot n)$$ $$\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}du\:f(u\frac{L}{\pi}+y)\lbrace\frac{1}{2\pi}+\frac{1}{\pi}\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}cos(u\cdot n)\rbrace$$ Now we have ##u=2\pi## as the solutions for ##cos(u\cdot n)=1## which to me looks like it gives ##f(2L+y)##. What am I not seeing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
New thought. What if I work backwards on this. so start with $$\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}f(2nL+y)$$ Then set this equal to $$\int dx f(x)\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(x-(2nL+y))$$ Now look at the delta term as a periodic term, and look at the Fourier transform definition of the Dirac Delta $$\delta(x-y)=\int\frac{dz}{2\pi}e^{iz(x-y)}$$ The Fourier will be invariant under rotation of multiples of ##2\pi##. So then, I can rewrite the integral as $$\int\frac{dz}{2\pi}e^{iz(x-y)}e^{-i2n\pi}$$ This will then give the new definition of the delta function $$\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(x-(2n\pi-y))=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\int\frac{dz}{2\pi}e^{iz(x-y)}e^{-i2n\pi}$$. But, then I need to worry about the modes of the system. I don't know if this moved me forward, or just in circles.
 
So, for the interested. I think I finally got this thing figured out. The first thing that we are going to do is transition to the complex Fourier series definitions of ##f(x)## and ##\delta(x-y)## and set ##L=\pi##. i.e. $$f(x)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}e^{inx}$$ and $$\delta(x-y)=\int\frac{dz}{2\pi}e^{iz(x-y)}$$ So that the formula takes the form $$\int dx f(x)\delta(x-y)=\int dx \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}e^{inx}\int\frac{dz}{2\pi}e^{iz(x-y)}$$ then doing some algebra we get $$\int dx \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}\int\frac{dz}{2\pi}e^{i[z(x-y)+nx]}$$ performing the integration we then get $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}\int dx\frac{e^{i[z(x-y)+nx]}}{2\pi i(x-y)}$$ Now we apply Cauchy's formula ##\oint\frac{g(w)}{w-w_0}dz=2\pi ig(w_0)## to this. Doing so we notice that the translations are ##w=x,w_0=y##, and that there is a pole at ##x=y##. So, the problem becomes $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}\int dx\frac{e^{i[z(x-y)+nx]}}{2\pi i(x-y)}=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}e^{i[z(y-y)+ny]}$$ Which then gives us the common result of the original problem $$\int dx f(x)\delta(x-y)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}e^{iny}=f(y)$$ Now, to progress from here we need to introduce yet another definition for the Dirac delta ##\delta(n)=\sum^{\infty}_{m=-\infty}e^{i2\pi nm}## we now multiple this by the new Fourier series giving $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}e^{iny}\sum^{\infty}_{m=-\infty}e^{i2\pi nm}=\sum^{\infty}_{m=-\infty}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_{n}e^{in(y+2\pi m)}=\sum^{\infty}_{m=-\infty}f(y+2\pi m)$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top