Direct vs Indirect drive for fusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kidphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Fusion
AI Thread Summary
Hohlraums are beneficial in laser fusion as they provide a uniform radiation source at shorter wavelengths by absorbing and heating the laser pulse. However, they are destroyed after each pulse, which raises concerns about their practicality. Both laser fusion and magnetic confinement have proven to be challenging paths toward achieving controlled fusion. Current technologies in both methods remain significantly short of the energy output required for sustainable fusion. Despite substantial investments, progress in achieving controlled fusion continues to be slow and complex.
Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
What is so good about having a hohlraum, and is it destroyed after every pulse?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It serves to provide a relatively uniform source of radiation at shorter wave lengths as it absorbs the laser pulse and heats up.
It is of course destroyed in the process.
The painful reality is that laser fusion has shown itself to be an equally thorny path to controlled fusion as magnetic confinement is. Either approach is still at least an order of magnitude or two short of what is needed, despite huge investments.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
85
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
8K
Back
Top