Direction and signs of unit vectors

AI Thread Summary
Negative quantities in vector notation can be interpreted as direction changes rather than negative magnitudes. Specifically, a negative quantity pointing in the positive z direction is equivalent to a positive quantity pointing in the negative z direction, represented mathematically as -A\hat{z} = A\hat{-z}. This equivalence highlights that vectors have directionality and magnitude, but do not possess negative magnitudes. Understanding this concept is crucial for correctly interpreting vector operations and their representations. Thus, the direction of a vector is essential in determining its equivalence to another vector with a different sign.
warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
If I have a negative quantity pointing in the positive z direction, is that the same as a positive quantity pointing in the negative z direction?

e.g.

does -A\hat{z}=A\hat{-z}?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yes they are the same
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top