Direction of Maximum Change for Function f(x, y) = x^2y^3 + xy at Point (-1, 2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jennifer1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function f(x, y) = x^2y^3 + xy, specifically examining the direction at the point (-1, 2) where the rate of change of f might equal 18. Participants are exploring the implications of the gradient vector and its relationship to directional derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the directional derivative formula and are questioning the relationship between the gradient vector's magnitude and the desired rate of change. There is also discussion about the direction of the gradient vector and its significance in determining the maximum rate of change.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights into the gradient vector and its components. There is recognition of potential errors in calculations and differing interpretations of the relationship between the gradient's magnitude and the rate of change. No consensus has been reached regarding the existence of a direction yielding a rate of change of 18.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the gradient's magnitude being less than 18, which raises questions about the feasibility of achieving the specified rate of change. There are also mentions of specific calculations that may have been miscalculated, affecting the overall understanding of the problem.

Jennifer1990
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f(x, y) = x^2y^3 + xy.
Is there a direction at (-1; 2) in which the rate of change of f is equal to 18?
Justify your answer.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


plugging this into the directional derivative formula, i get
18 = -v1 + 13v2, where v1 and v2 are the components of the vector in whose direction the rate of change is 18.
But i do not know where to go from here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about the magnitude of the gradient vector at a point?
 
I don't see that the "magnitude of the gradient vector" has anything to do with this problem. I do not, however, see how Jennifer1990 got that result. The gradient of f(x,y)= x^2y^3+ xy is \nabla f(x,y)= (2xy^3+y)\vec{i}+ (3x^2y^2+ x)\vec{j} and so \nabla f(-1, 2)= (2(-1)(2)^3+ 2)\vec{i}+ (3(-1)^2(2)^+ (-1))\vec{j}= -14\vec{i}+ 5\vec{j}. So the directional derivative, in the directon of vector v_1\vec{i}+ v_2\vec{j}[/tex] is <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">-14v_1+ 5v_2= 18</formula>. Now remember that you do not want <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">v_1</formula> and <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">v_2</formula> themselves, you just want the direction, the ratio between them. Another way to do this is to remember that a unit vector, in the direction at angle <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">\theta</formula> to the x-axis, is given by <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ sin(\theta)\vec{j}</formula>. Solve <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">-14 cos(\theta)+ 5 sin(\theta)= 18</formula> for <formula class="mathJaxEqu" data-display="false">\theta</formula>.
 
Isn't the direction of the gradient vector the one in which the function changes most rapidly, where its magnitude is the value of this greatest rate of change? When i made my suggestion, what i was getting at was the fact that the magnitude of del f is less than 18, hence there is no direction in which the rate of change is 18. My apologies if this is not correct.
 
Danago's argument is correct, since in general \nablaw is the fastest increase of w and the magnitude of \nablaw is the maximum directional derivative in that direction. HallsofIvy's logic is correct as well but the attempt to solve for theta will come up short. Keep in mind that he did not compute the "j component = 5" correctly if you attempt to go forward with what he did.
 
Sorry Danago, that was just too clever for me!


Oh! The j component is 3(-1)^2(2)^2+ (-1)= 11. Thanks, chriscolose.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K