Direction of motion if there are two unequal opposite forces

AI Thread Summary
When a particle is at rest on the ground and an upward force is applied that produces an acceleration of 4.9 m/s², it will not move upward due to the downward gravitational acceleration of 9.8 m/s². To initiate upward motion, the applied force must exceed the gravitational force, requiring a net positive force greater than 9.8 m/s². If the force is less than the weight of the object, it will remain stationary. Additionally, in free fall, a momentary upward force will only slow the object down rather than reverse its direction. Ultimately, it is the net force that determines the acceleration and direction of motion.
NoahCygnus
Messages
96
Reaction score
2
If a particle is in the state of rest on the ground , and I apply a force such that it produces an acceleration 4.9 ##\frac{m}{s^2}## upward , will it move upward , considering there's gravitational acceleration 9.8 ##\frac{m}{s^2}## in the downward direction, or will it remain at rest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the force produces that acceleration, then it must move. But it takes a force of ## (9.8 + 4.9)m ## Newton to do this with a mass ##m##. Any force less than ##mg## and it doesn't move.
 
BvU said:
If the force produces that acceleration, then it must move. But it takes a force of ## (9.8 + 4.9)m ## Newton to do this with a mass ##m##. Any force less than ##mg## and it doesn't move.
So it takes a force which produces an acceleration greater than 9.8 m/s^2 in opposite direction to gravitational acceleration to move the body in upward direction?
 
The net force on the object must be positive (upward direction) for it to start moving in that direction, if it was initially at rest. If the body were free falling (and thus subject exclusively to gravity), a momentary application of a net positive force will slow it down (reduce its speed) but won't make it instantaneously start going up. This is a common misconception; it is the velocity vector which tells you in which direction the body is moving, not the acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes NoahCygnus
NoahCygnus said:
So it takes a force which produces an acceleration greater than 9.8 m/s^2 in opposite direction to gravitational acceleration to move the body in upward direction?
To keep an object in place in a gravitation field it takes a force ##mg## to produce no acceleration whatsoever. It just compensates the gravity force. As Joe says, it's the net force that causes the acceleration.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top