Directional derivative question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concepts of directional derivatives and level curves in multivariable calculus. The participants clarify that level curves represent lines of equal height on a 2D contour map derived from a 3D graph, specifically expressed as z = f(x,y). The directional derivative is defined as the rate of change of a function in a specified direction, represented mathematically as df(kcosθ,ksinθ)/dk, where θ is the angle with the x-axis. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting gradients in various contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with gradient vectors
  • Knowledge of contour maps and their representation
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically angles and their cosine/sine values
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical definition and applications of directional derivatives
  • Explore the relationship between gradients and level curves in multivariable functions
  • Learn how to create and interpret contour maps from 3D functions
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of gradients in different contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, as well as professionals in fields requiring multivariable analysis, such as engineering and physics.

question dude
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
attachment.php?attachmentid=262056&d=1389451604.jpg



I've done the first part, but I'm stuck on the second paragraph of the question. Maybe I'm being stupid, I don't even understand exactly what is meant by, 'the level curve'.

I also don't quite understand the whole concept of directional derivative. When it says, 'the gradient in the direction making an angle A with the x-axis, how should I think of this? what does the gradient mean in this context?

because when its just a simple curve/line on an xy axis, I know what the 'gradient' means, it is literally how much 'y' changes per unit x along that curve/line. But when I'm told about a 'gradient in a direction', I'm confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey, question dude! :smile:
question dude said:
… what is meant by, 'the level curve'.

think of the 3D graph, z = f(x,y)

you can make a 2D contour map showing the lines of equal height

those contours are the level curves :wink:
I also don't quite understand the whole concept of directional derivative. When it says, 'the gradient in the direction making an angle A with the x-axis, how should I think of this? what does the gradient mean in this context?

the directional derivative in the direction (cosθ,sinθ) is df(kcosθ,ksinθ)/dk

it's the rate at which f increases if you go along the line y/x = tanθ :smile:
 
question dude said:
attachment.php?attachmentid=262056&d=1389451604.jpg



I've done the first part, but I'm stuck on the second paragraph of the question. Maybe I'm being stupid, I don't even understand exactly what is meant by, 'the level curve'.

I also don't quite understand the whole concept of directional derivative. When it says, 'the gradient in the direction making an angle A with the x-axis, how should I think of this? what does the gradient mean in this context?

because when its just a simple curve/line on an xy axis, I know what the 'gradient' means, it is literally how much 'y' changes per unit x along that curve/line. But when I'm told about a 'gradient in a direction', I'm confused.

You are supposed to show your work, confused or not (those are PF rules). I don't see how you can have done the first part (which involves directional derivatives) but then claim you do not understand directional derivatives. I would need to see your work in order to grasp what is going on.
 
tiny-tim said:
hey, question dude! :smile:


think of the 3D graph, z = f(x,y)

you can make a 2D contour map showing the lines of equal height

those contours are the level curves :wink:


the directional derivative in the direction (cosθ,sinθ) is df(kcosθ,ksinθ)/dk

it's the rate at which f increases if you go along the line y/x = tanθ :smile:

Thanks a lot! I understand what's going on now. Before I was just plugging in the numbers without knowing the concepts properly.
 
Ray Vickson said:
You are supposed to show your work, confused or not (those are PF rules). I don't see how you can have done the first part (which involves directional derivatives) but then claim you do not understand directional derivatives. I would need to see your work in order to grasp what is going on.

Sorry about that, what I meant to get across, was that I understood the method in a sort of algorithmic way, but didn't understood the reason behind steps due to not understanding some basic stuff like 'level curve'. Anyway its sorted now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K