Discharging a capacitor, how variables change over time

AI Thread Summary
In a parallel plate capacitor disconnected from a power source, a resistor allows current flow, leading to changes in voltage, current, and stored energy over time. The current I(t) and potential difference V(t) both decline exponentially, with the equations I = (V/R) exp(-t/RC) and V(t) = V exp(-t/RC) illustrating this relationship. The charge Q on the capacitor also varies with time, confirming that both current and voltage decrease as the capacitor discharges. The stored energy U decreases faster than voltage due to the relationship U = 0.5CV^2. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing capacitor discharge behavior in electrical circuits.
tomwilliam2
Messages
117
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I have a parallel plate capacitor of area A, width d, potential difference V between the plates, and it is disconnected from the source of emf. A wire of resistance R is placed between the plates to allow a current to flow. Draw a sketch to show how the voltage, current and stored energy change over time.

Homework Equations



I = (V/R) exp (-t/RC)

The Attempt at a Solution


The capacitance and resistance are constants I think, as they depend only on the physical characteristics of the setup. So I know that I/V will see an exponential decline over time, tending to zero as t tends to infinity. What I don't know, is how each of them varies individually. I presume the potential difference between the plates will tend to zero, so V will decrease over time (exponentially as well?) and that the current can only flow with a voltage difference. I suspect that they both decline exponentially but can't work out how to demonstrate this.
It might involve I = dQ/dt and V= Ed, but I can't get any further than that.
I guess the energy must decline faster though, as U = 0.5CV^2 and V is declining exponentially.
Any help greatly appreciatec
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have correctly found the current I(t).

Since there is just the resistor and capacitor in the circuit, and nothing else, they both have the same current and potential difference. Since you have I, try to think if either the resistor or the capacitor can be used somehow to determine V(t), given the I(t) you have.

(Too bad they chose to call the initial potential difference V, since that is often used for a varying potential difference. So my "V(t)" means the one varying over time, not the initial "V".)
 
Thanks very much.

So I know that for the current across the capacitor:
I(t) = dQ/dt
And that this is also the current across the resistor.

The potential difference across the capacitor is (rearranging the equation given):

V_c(t) = IR exp (t/RC)
V_c(t) = (dQ/dt)R exp (t/RC)

Which is also the potential difference across the resistor. I can use V=Q/C to get

Q/C = (dQ/dt)R exp (t/RC)
Or maybe

I = (Q/CR) exp (-t/RC)
But isn't Q here actually Q(t) as the charge on the plates is a function of time?

This would give me
V = (Q/C) exp (-t/RC)

Meaning that both the current and the potential difference were exponentially declining with time. Is that correct?
 
tomwilliam2 said:
Thanks very much.

So I know that for the current across the capacitor:
I(t) = dQ/dt
And that this is also the current across the resistor.

The potential difference across the capacitor is (rearranging the equation given):

V_c(t) = IR exp (t/RC)
V_c(t) = (dQ/dt)R exp (t/RC)
.
.
.
That's fine, but I'll just say it would have gone much easier if you had thought about the resistor instead of the capacitor. How are p.d. and current related to each other for a resistor?


.
.
.
This would give me
V = (Q/C) exp (-t/RC)

Meaning that both the current and the potential difference were exponentially declining with time. Is that correct?
It is correct, however Q and C are not "givens" in the problem statement. Can you write it in terms of the given parameters?
 
Ah, I think I've got it. It comes out as

V(t) = V exp (-t/RC)

Where V is the total charge at t=0. I see what you mean, it's confusing that V is the starting PD and the variable which changes with time...

Thanks very much for your help
 
You're welcome, glad it worked out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top