A Discover the Mystery of the Rotating Cylinder Phenomenon

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hita
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physical phenomenon observed with a rotating puck and dye in water, where an invisible cylinder forms around the puck, preventing dye from spreading within that area. Participants suggest that the effect may relate to fluid dynamics, specifically mentioning the concept of a Taylor column, although it is clarified that the puck is not submerged. The interaction between the dye and the fluid is characterized by a lack of turbulence, allowing the dye to remain concentrated outside the invisible cylinder. The original poster seeks the specific name for this phenomenon but has not yet identified it. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of fluid behavior in relation to rotating objects.
Hita
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there.
Long time ago i saw a video of a physical phenom. The procedure was : At the bottom we have something like a puck (a circle with thickness), which is rotating. And above with have a jar of water. And when we throw some dye. We can see that phenom : there is like an invisible cylindre that follow the circle at the bottom but in water. So we have the dye who spread everywear but not in this cylindre.

I can't remember what was the name of the phenom, and i coudln't fint it with key-words on internet. Thanks for helping me.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20160310_171119.jpg
    IMG_20160310_171119.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you thinking of this?



I'm not sure if there's a specific name for this, though it works because the ink doesn't spread much, and the flow of the fluid surrounding the ink is not turbulent.
Instead of dissolved, I think one says that the ink is enfolded in the fluid.
 
  • Like
Likes drvrm
To me it sounds like you may be describing a Taylor column. Try looking in the videos section of

spinlab.ess.ucla.edu

Jason
 
Thanks for your response.
Sorry jfizzix this not this.
Jason, this was just like Taylor column but the object was not un the water. Your answer help me a lot
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top