Discover Your Personality Type: Take the Quiz!

  • Thread starter Thread starter cesarcesar2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quiz Type
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating a personality quiz with 50 questions that assigns users to one of five personality types based on their responses. The main challenge is developing an accurate scoring algorithm that reflects the weighted answers, as the current attempts yield misleading percentages. Users express confusion over how to effectively weight answers, with suggestions to index values for each response to better differentiate personality types. There is a consensus that a scoring system must incorporate weights beyond a neutral value to ensure meaningful results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in scoring mechanics to enhance the quiz's accuracy and reliability.
cesarcesar2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I making a personality quiz that goes like the following.

User takes a test to determine which type of person they are more like. So there will be say 5 types, each given a percentage of 100 that they are closest to at quiz end. The test has 50 questions, plus a age question and a sex question. Each test has 5 possible answers. The user clicks through radio button to fill out the quiz. No sweat so far.

My issue is in the test scoring, this is were i get confused. When making a test, each answer is weighted to fit a specific personality type. The weights are shown on screen as +6 thru 0 thru -6. (In code as 1-13, zero the default get 7 points). I have tried a few different scoring algos but non seem to be accurate. One other thing, I have to assume that a value other than zero WILL NOT be chosen when building a quiz.

1st try - Multiple count of all questions times 7 (7 is middle or 0 on scale), then divide by total points gotten from weighted answers. This ends up being something like 350/372 = 94%. This is all good till you get a score like 350/352 = 99%. In percentage you can assume that the second score is higher, but in reality the first score had the greater point spread.

2nd try - Add the highest value (up to 13) from each questions answers together for each personality type, then divide by total points gotten from weighted answers. This ends up something similar to the above try, but with higher percentages going to those personality types with answers that have no weights attached to them.

OK so now that i have written this I am really thinking that the quizzes will not work if weights are not set to other than zero (aka 7 points). Am I totally off here? Can anyone lead me in a proper direction. Thanks much for helping my keep what hair is left on my head.

Cesar
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Before you "bump", make sure what you have written is intelligible!

cesarcesar2 said:
I making a personality quiz that goes like the following.

User takes a test to determine which type of person they are more like. So there will be say 5 types, each given a percentage of 100 that they are closest to at quiz end. The test has 50 questions, plus a age question and a sex question. Each test has 5 possible answers. The user clicks through radio button to fill out the quiz. No sweat so far.
What, even the sex question has 5 possible answers? If you are only talking about the "50 questions" don't make things ambiguous by adding irrelevant information.

My issue is in the test scoring, this is were i get confused. When making a test, each answer is weighted to fit a specific personality type. The weights are shown on screen as +6 thru 0 thru -6. (In code as 1-13, zero the default get 7 points). I have tried a few different scoring algos but non seem to be accurate.
What do you mean by "accurate"? Determining whether or not an algorithm is "accurate" requires knowing what the "correct" answer is. Are you talking about creating a scoring algorithm for a test you are making or are you trying to figure out what algorithm a test you found on the internet is using?

One other thing, I have to assume that a value other than zero WILL NOT be chosen when building a quiz.

1st try - Multiple count of all questions times 7 (7 is middle or 0 on scale), then divide by total points gotten from weighted answers. This ends up being something like 350/372 = 94%. This is all good till you get a score like 350/352 = 99%. In percentage you can assume that the second score is higher, but in reality the first score had the greater point spread.

2nd try - Add the highest value (up to 13) from each questions answers together for each personality type, then divide by total points gotten from weighted answers. This ends up something similar to the above try, but with higher percentages going to those personality types with answers that have no weights attached to them.

OK so now that i have written this I am really thinking that the quizzes will not work if weights are not set to other than zero (aka 7 points). Am I totally off here? Can anyone lead me in a proper direction. Thanks much for helping my keep what hair is left on my head.

Cesar
What most such "tests" do is just add the numeric value of all the answers. Each "personality" would correspond to a range of possible sums.
 
I'm not really sure what you're asking but...

Why not try "indexing" values? For example...

Question1
~~~~~~
Choice A gives +2 points to personality A, +1 to personality B, +0 to personality C, etc.

Choice B gives +1 points to personality A, +4 to personality B, +1 to personality C, etc.

Choice C gives +0 points to personality A, +0 to personality B, +3 to personality C, etc.
~~~~~~

Each choice increases the value (score) of differing personalities?

Then again, I might be answering the wrong question!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top