Discovering the Mass of Earth: How Did Scientists First Calculate It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter argonurbawono
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Mass
AI Thread Summary
Scientists originally estimated the mass of Earth through the Cavendish experiment, which involved suspending a rod from a thread and observing its movement in response to a nearby large object of known mass. By measuring the rod's movement and understanding the thread's resistance, they calculated the gravitational constant (G). Using the formula M=gr^2/G, where g is the acceleration due to gravity and r is the Earth's radius, they were able to compute Earth's mass. This method was groundbreaking, demonstrating that gravitational force could be measured in such a manner. The experiment laid the foundation for our current understanding of Earth's mass, estimated at around 10^24 kg.
argonurbawono
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
i know nothing about astronomy, so please excuse my silly question here.

how did people originally estimate the mass of earth?

i sense our current data of Earth mass (10^24 kg? or so) has been there for quite sometime. how did they do it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I forget the name of the experiment, but ~100 years ago, a scientist suspended a rod from a thread. He knew the resistance the thread would have in keeping the rod from spinning. Then he put a large object of known mass near the rod and watched how much the rod moved. Kinda like how much the Earth's magnetic field makes a compass needle turn. Except this "compass needle" responded to gravity.

Measuring how far it moved and knowing how hard the thread would resist this motion, he calculated G, the gravitational constant. With that, he used the formula g=GM/r^2, re-written as M=gr^2/G. g is known. It's 9.81 m/s/s. r is known. It's 6378000m. Now that he knew G, M is computable.

** edit **
Cavendish experiment. Just Google for "weighing the Earth" or "Cavendish experiment" and you'll get a whole collection of web sites describing the experiment in detail. I pretty much got it right. But it was ~200 years ago.
 
Last edited:
thanks.

i feel it is very strange that gravitational force can be observed in that way. if it were just an experiment proposal, i would definitely say it wouldn't work.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top