Discrepancy in my calculations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lilrex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on discrepancies in thermodynamics calculations related to a diesel cycle, specifically comparing simulated work to theoretical energy outputs. The user reports a mechanical work output of 133 kJ against an input of 31 kJ, indicating a significant deviation from expected thermal efficiency predictions of 42%. Key variables include pressure (p), compression ratio (Cr), and temperature (T), with calculations involving the specific heat ratio (y) of 1.4. The lack of a clear problem statement and detailed calculations hinders effective troubleshooting of the user's errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles, particularly the diesel cycle.
  • Familiarity with specific heat ratios and their application in calculations.
  • Knowledge of pressure-volume relationships in thermodynamic systems.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving temperature changes and compression ratios.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of the diesel cycle and its efficiency calculations.
  • Study the impact of compression ratios on pressure and temperature in thermodynamic systems.
  • Learn about the significance of specific heat ratios in energy calculations.
  • Investigate common errors in thermodynamic calculations and how to avoid them.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focused on thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in energy efficiency analysis in diesel engines.

lilrex
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem with some thermodynamics calculations. I am not very experienced with them and it certainly shows in my frustration with them! Anyway the check that I am using is incrementally simulated work compared to theoretical energy in.

Example 31KJ in 133KJ mechanical work out. I am obviously way off considering other calculations predicted 42% thermal eff. if you ignore over unity. (diesel cycle)

I am having trouble formulating intelligent questions that might help me understand what I am doing wrong but here it goes:

let:

p = pressure, y = 1.4,Cr = compressed volume ratio, Ps = initial pressure, Ta = temp added = 1000,
Ti = initial temperature = 300K
Vr = volume ratio

Vr = Cr
if Cr = 1, then T = Ti * Cr^(y-1) = 300K, T = T + Ta, Cr = (T/Ti)^(1/(y-1)) = 39.089

if the volume did not increase, p = 14.7 * cr^(1.4) = 2490 psi

is this not correct? or am I missing something?

now if Vr = .5 then Cr = Cr/Vr = 78

1714K = Ti * Cr^(y-1)
and
6550 PSI = 14.7 * Cr^(1.4)
How does this second part look?

Thank you for your help, I appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
You did not state the problem as given to you. Instead, you present your erroneous calculations and ask us to figure out where you went wrong. Without a clear statement of the problem and your work showing how you got 31 kJ in and 133 kJ mechanical work out, we cannot figure out where you went wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K