Discrete Random Variable - basic question in probability.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expected value of a discrete random variable, specifically in the context of a biased coin toss scenario where the probability of getting heads is 2/5. Participants explore the calculation of the expected number of tosses needed to achieve heads for the first time, utilizing the probability mass function and summation techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the expected value formula E[X] and how to apply it to the problem. There are attempts to relate the problem to geometric distributions and to derive the expected value using summation techniques. Some participants question the validity of using geometric series and moment generating functions, while others explore the implications of different approaches.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various methods being proposed and explored. Some participants have provided insights into the geometric distribution and its relationship to the problem, while others express uncertainty about the application of certain formulas. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning have emerged.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the requirement to use calculus in their answers and the potential limitations of using geometric distribution methods. There is also mention of the need to clarify the role of the variable 'n' in the summation process.

Roni1985
Messages
200
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If X is a discrete random variable having a probability mass function p(x), the expectation or the
expected value of X, denoted E[X], is defined to be

E[X]=Σ x*p(x)

A biased coin is tossed until “heads” appears for the first time. If the probability of a “head” for
the coin is 2
5 , the expected number of tosses needed to get “heads” for the first time is given b
Σ(n*2/5*(3/5)^(n-1)

the summation is from n=1 to infinite.

Compute the expected value. (the expected value need not be an integer.)

Homework Equations



Σ(n*2/5*(3/5)^(n-1)=5/2


The Attempt at a Solution



First I found the number of tosses needed to get heads, but I don't understand how to interpret this in the E[X] formula.
I know that my
p(x)=.40
what is my x ? "tails for the first time" ? how to translate it in a numerical representation ?

and the summation is from n=0 to n=2.5 ??


Thanks,
Roni.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems like a geometric distribution.

Let's define X = number of tosses needed until the first head appears.

When x=1, it means that you get a head in your very first toss. So, p(x=1) = 0.4
When x =2, it means that you get a tail in your first toss and a head in your second toss, so p(x=2) = (0.6)(0.4).
When x = 3, ..., p(x=3) = (0.6)^2 (0.4)
...until...
When x = n, ..., p (x=n) = (0.6)^(n-1) x (0.4)

So, your E(X) = summation of x times p(x) [values of x is from 1 to infinity]
= 1 x p(x=1) + 2 x p(x=2) + 3 x p(x=3) + ... + n x p(x=n)
=1x0.4 + 2 x (0.6)(0.4) + 3 x (0.6)^2 x (0.4) + ... + n x (0.6)^(n-1) x (0.4)


Factor out 0.4.

Now, either the E(X) is a value or it might not be convergent. If it's the latter, than E(X) does not exist.

Hope that helps. ;)
 
Okay, I find the formula for calculating E(X) for a geometric distribution.

E(X) = 1/p. (obtained by using the moment generating function)

So in this case the answer is simply E(X) = 1/0.4 = 2.5 ;)
 
Last edited:
lkh1986 said:
Okay, I find the formula for calculating E(X) for a geometric distribution.

E(X) = 1/p. (obtained by using the moment generating function)

So in this case the answer is simply E(X) = 1/0.4 = 2.5 ;)

Thank you for your help, it did help me understand.
I just forgot to mention one thing. We should use calculus in our answers.
I don't think we are supposed to use geometric distribution.

However, geometric series might work here.
I just don't know what to do with the 'n'.
the sum of a geometric series is
S=a/(1-r)
the 'r' is 3/5
but I can't figure out the 'a' since it's a constant number.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
You're welcome. ;)
 
I am still not able to solve the problem with the geometric series formula (a/(1-r)).
Is it even possible ?


Thanks
 
up :)
 
I think you can use the moment generating function method to compute the sum. It's about differentiation and summation.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080121114534AAXsi9J

The mean is:

E(X) =


∑ x * P(X = x)
x = 0


∑ x * p * q ^ x
x = 0

change the index, the first terms of the sum is zero so we can start the index from 1


∑ x * p * q ^ (x - 1)
x = 1

factor out a p

. . . ∞
p * ∑ x * q ^ (x - 1)
. . x = 1

note that the argument in the sum is a derivative:
∂ q^x / ∂q = x q ^ (x-1)

. . . ∞
p * ∑ ∂[q ^ (x - 1)] / ∂q
. . x = 1

it is not a trivial task to interchange a sumation and differentiation but it is valid in this case.

. . . . . . . ∞
p * ∂/∂q ∑ q ^ (x - 1)
. . . . . . x = 1

the sum is a geometric sum missing the first term and will evaluate to (1 / (1 - q) - 1)

p * ∂/∂q * (1 / (1 - q) - 1)

take the derivative

p * (1 / (1 - q)²)

write in terms of p

p * ( 1/ (1 - (1-p)² )) = p / p² = 1/p

qed.

You can substitute in the value of p = 0.4 into the working shown above. ;)
 
Roni1985 said:
I am still not able to solve the problem with the geometric series formula (a/(1-r)).
Is it even possible ?


Thanks

Yes, it is possible. Your expectation for this particular X is

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n\left( \frac{2}{5} \right) \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br /> = \frac{2}{5} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br />

The sumation is the derivative of the geometric power series \sum x^n evaluated at 3/5. Since that series sums to 1/(1-x) then our series is 1/(1-x)2.

So

\frac{2}{5} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br /> =\frac{2}{5} \cdot \frac{1}{(1 - 3/5)^2} = \frac{2}{5} \cdot \frac{25}{4} = \frac{5}{2}<br />.


--Elucidus
 
  • #10
Elucidus said:
Yes, it is possible. Your expectation for this particular X is

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n\left( \frac{2}{5} \right) \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br /> = \frac{2}{5} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br />

The sumation is the derivative of the geometric power series \sum x^n evaluated at 3/5. Since that series sums to 1/(1-x) then our series is 1/(1-x)2.

So

\frac{2}{5} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br /> =\frac{2}{5} \cdot \frac{1}{(1 - 3/5)^2} = \frac{2}{5} \cdot \frac{25}{4} = \frac{5}{2}<br />.


--Elucidus

Thank you for your answer, you really helped me here.
I was wondering if it's possible to solve it with Riemann Sums ?

I know it's going to give me a good approximation.

Thanks.
 
  • #11
Elucidus said:
Yes, it is possible. Your expectation for this particular X is

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n\left( \frac{2}{5} \right) \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br /> = \frac{2}{5} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br />

The sumation is the derivative of the geometric power series \sum x^n evaluated at 3/5. Since that series sums to 1/(1-x) then our series is 1/(1-x)2.

So

\frac{2}{5} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n \left( \frac{3}{5} \right)^{n-1}<br /> =\frac{2}{5} \cdot \frac{1}{(1 - 3/5)^2} = \frac{2}{5} \cdot \frac{25}{4} = \frac{5}{2}<br />.--Elucidus

Now that I am looking at your answer again... I don't think I understand how you are getting 1/(1-x)^2.
I understand that 1/(1-x) would be perfect here if we didn't have the 'n'
...
EDIT:

Now, that I am looking at it again, I noticed that it's the derivative of 1/(1-x).

Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K