Discussion regarding the frames of reference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the movement of a passenger in a car that crashes into a wall without wearing a seatbelt. Two frames of reference are considered: one where the car is the reference point, indicating the passenger undergoes uniformly accelerated motion after the crash, and another where the road is the reference, suggesting the passenger continues at a uniform speed due to inertia. The consensus is that the passenger's speed upon hitting the windshield equals the car's speed before the crash, assuming no other forces act on the passenger. It is recommended to use an inertial frame for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the passenger's movement can be viewed as both accelerated and non-accelerated, depending on the chosen frame of reference.
george ozua
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A person is inside a car. This person is not using the seat belt. The car crashes with a solid wall and decelerates quickly. The person, due to inertia, keeps moving until stopped by the wind shield.
I want to analyze the movement of this person after the crash, but I am troubled because I do not know what frame of reference I should take.
A) If we take the car as the frame of reference, I think the person describes a uniformly accelerated motion after the crash. The reasons to state this are the following- Before the crash, the wind shield and the person move at the same speed (therefore, there is no movement between them). After the crash, the wind shield stops completely ( because the car stops completely) and the person starts to move in relation to the car. The movement of the person is uniformly accelerated because the person (in relation to the car) parts from absolute repose to an x speed.
B) If we take the road or a fixed observer outside the car as the frame of reference, the person inside the car moves at a uniform speed (non accelerated motion) after the crash. The reasons to state this are the following- in relation to the road and before the crash, the person moves at the speed of the car (the person passes through every point of the road at the speed of the car). After the crash, the car stops completely, but the person keeps moving at its previous speed (due to inertia) in relation to the road. Therefore, there is not really any change in the person s speed and the movement cannot be considered as accelerated (at least until he hits the windshield).
Taking into account all the previous information, if I want to analyze the movement of the passenger, what frame or reference should I take (A or B)? (By analyzing the movement of the passenger I mean obtaining data such as the impact velocity of the passenger with the windshield and the usage of SUVAT ecuations). Independently from the car and the road, how does the person moves? Is he moving all the time at uniform speed until he hits the windshield? or, is he moving at uniform speed before the car crash and in an accelerated motion after the car crash? Can his movement be considerated as accelerated and non accelerated at the same time? Most importantly, how can I calculate his speed when he hits the windshield?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't take example #1. This would ignore the very real acceleration on the car and attribute a false acceleration to the driver. Go with #2.

The speed of the driver when they hit the windshield will be equal to the speed the car was traveling before the impact, assuming that nothing else slows the driver down and the car comes to a complete stop before the driver hits the windshield.
 
Seconded - when you have the option, go with an inertial frame.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top