Disk brakes along the rim of the wheel?

AI Thread Summary
Placing disc brakes along the rim of a wheel could theoretically require less force to stop the wheel due to increased torque, but it also results in a faster-moving rim that allows more wheel to slide past the caliper before stopping. This means that while the force needed may decrease, the overall energy required remains the same. Current bicycle designs favor hub-mounted brakes for their efficiency and effectiveness, despite the potential advantages of rim-mounted disc brakes. The discussion highlights that the total braking performance is determined by the product of squeeze force and the area swept, which remains constant regardless of brake placement. Ultimately, the design choice in bike braking systems balances various factors beyond just energy efficiency.
Raama
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Disk brakes along the rim of the wheel??

Hi friends,
I have a doubt. I heard that when we keep the disc brake along the rim of the wheel, less energy is required to stop the wheel. Why is it so?? Why is it not used in today's bikes?:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


when we keep it along the rim of the wheel then torque about center of wheel increases and bike stops sooner
 


Disk brakes consist of a pair of calipers squeezing two parallel surfaces. Caliper brakes on a bicycle consist of of a pair of calipers squeezing the rim of the wheel. The rim surfaces are fairly parallel.

Congratulations, you've reinvented the bicycle caliper brake.
 


Raama said:
Hi friends,
I have a doubt. I heard that when we keep the disc brake along the rim of the wheel, less energy is required to stop the wheel. Why is it so?? Why is it not used in today's bikes?:confused:

Not less energy, just less force.

At the rim you won't have to squeeze as hard, but rim is moving faster, so more wheel will slide past the caliper before is stops. At the hub the torque is much greater, so you will have to squeeze much harder...but the hub is moving slower, so less wheel will slide past the caliper before it stops.

In the end, the squeeze force x area swept will be the same wherever you place the brakes.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top