Disks, Shells, Washers- Calculus AB/BC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Justabeginner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the area between the curves f(x) = x^3 + x^2 and g(x) = 2x^2 + 2x. Participants initially struggled with the correct setup for integrals, particularly the need for absolute values due to negative areas. After several attempts and clarifications, it was established that the area should be calculated using the absolute difference between the functions to avoid negative results. The final correct area was determined to be 37/12 after addressing sign errors in the calculations. The conversation emphasized the importance of correctly identifying which function is greater over the specified intervals to avoid confusion with negative areas.
Justabeginner
Messages
309
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the area bounded by the curves f(x)= x^3 + x^2 and g(x)= 2x^2 + 2x.

Homework Equations


\int ((f(x)-g(x))^2)\, dx and \int ((g(x)-f(x))^2)\, dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I found out the intersection of f(x) and g(x) first. I think there are three points: -1, 0, and 2. I then set the a and b values for those integrals -1 and 0, and 0 and 2 respectively. I got -13pi/105 as the result of the first integral, and -11104pi/105 as the result of the second integral. Adding them up, I got 11117pi/105 and this is incorrect apparently. I would appreciate some guidance on if my technique is correct or not, or if I've just messed up a calculation. Thank you so much. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you calculate the area between two curves? It should be A = ∫|f(x)-g(x)| dx, right? How, then, can you possibly get pi's in your answer?
 
I did not realize that. Thank you for the clarification. I'll solve it in that way now.

I solved it in that method, and got 59/12 as my final answer, but it's not correct. o.0 Did I do something wrong?
 
Yes you did, as is evident from the fact that your answer is wrong. However, it's terribly difficult to guess what your error may be, without seeing your working.
 
Well my work involved solving the integral of f(x)-g(x) with a and b being -1 and 0 respectively and adding it to the integral of g(x)- f(x) with a and b being 0 and 2 respectively.

Oh wait, I didn't do the absolute value of that, just as you showed in the first post. Can you explain why you're using the absolute value? Because in other problems solved, since part of the equation was under the x-axis negative area was involved.

Doing it with the absolute value, I now get:

1/4* x^4 + 1/3* x^3 + x^2 (with a being -1 and be being 0)
11/12 - 0= 11/12

For the second part with a being 0 and b being 2, I get:

32/3- 0 = 32/3

Adding the two results, I get a new answer of 139/12.

This is STILL not right. I'm a bit frustrated, as I've literally done this about fifteen times, and I still can't get it. :/
 
Justabeginner said:
Doing it with the absolute value, I now get:

1/4* x^4 + 1/3* x^3 + x^2 (with a being -1 and be being 0)*
11/12 - 0= 11/12
I think there are some sign errors in the line *

For the second part with a being 0 and b being 2, I get:

32/3- 0 = 32/3
I get something different - could you have a possible sign error again?
 
I have returned with the right answer! And a better understanding of the approach. :D

Yes, CAF123, thank you- I did have a sign error.

For the left hand side I come out with 5/12 and for the right hand side, 8/3. Adding the two together, I get 37/12, which is correct!

And thank you Clamtrox for helping me with the main equation- I now see what my main mistake was!

I should really not get flustered and pay closer attention to my signs next time. -.-
 
Justabeginner said:
Can you explain why you're using the absolute value?

Absolute value is there because there's no such thing as negative area. You should order the functions so that you subtract smaller from the larger value.
 
You don't need the absolute value if you set each integral up correctly, and in some cases, using the absolute value will give you the wrong answer. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on [a, b], then the integrand should be f(x) - g(x). If f(x) ≤ g(x) on [b, c], then the integrand should be g(x) - f(x).
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
You don't need the absolute value if you set each integral up correctly, and in some cases, using the absolute value will give you the wrong answer. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on [a, b], then the integrand should be f(x) - g(x). If f(x) ≤ g(x) on [b, c], then the integrand should be g(x) - f(x).
In this case on ##[-1,0], f(x) \geq g(x)##, however ##\int_{-1}^0 f - g \,\,dx < 0 ##(because the majority of the region enclosed is below x axis), so in this case an abs value sign is needed.
 
  • #11
CAF123 said:
In this case on ##[-1,0], f(x) \geq g(x)##, however ##\int_{-1}^0 f - g \,\,dx < 0 ##(because the majority of the region enclosed is below x axis), so in this case an abs value sign is needed.
No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##

As a simple example of how this works, consider -2 and -4. -2 > -4 and -2 - (-4) = +2 > 0.
 
  • #12
clamtrox said:
Absolute value is there because there's no such thing as negative area. You should order the functions so that you subtract smaller from the larger value.

Yes, but in certain texts, I've seen the person solving the problem, say the area is negative simply because the area extends below the x-axis. o.0 Can you explain why that holds true in that case, or was it an error on their part?
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##

As a simple example of how this works, consider -2 and -4. -2 > -4 and -2 - (-4) = +2 > 0.

That really cleared up some things. Thank you :)
 
  • #14
Mark44 said:
No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##

As a simple example of how this works, consider -2 and -4. -2 > -4 and -2 - (-4) = +2 > 0.

Yes, sorry Mark.
 
  • #15
Justabeginner said:
Yes, but in certain texts, I've seen the person solving the problem, say the area is negative simply because the area extends below the x-axis. o.0 Can you explain why that holds true in that case, or was it an error on their part?
Error on their part.
The value of an integral can be negative; e.g. ## \int_{-1}^1 x^2 - 1~ dx##,
but the area of a geometric region is always nonnegative.

If you're asked to find the area of the region that is bounded above by the x-axis and below by the graph of y = x2 - 1, you should get a positive number.
 
  • #16
I understand. Thank you so much for clarifying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K