Disproving Euler's Identity: Check My Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter Onyxus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an individual's claim of having disproved Euler's Identity, leading to a series of mathematical steps that conclude with the erroneous statement that 2 equals 0. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the complex logarithm, noting that the logarithm is a multivalued function, which is crucial for correctly interpreting the equations presented. The original poster admits to a lack of knowledge in complex numbers and acknowledges the need for further study. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the significance of proper mathematical definitions and understanding in complex analysis. The thread serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in advanced mathematical concepts.
Onyxus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was messing around with Euler’s Identity and I think I accidently disproved it. I would like someone to check my math to make sure I didn’t make any rookie mistakes.

<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> e^{\pi i} + 1 = 0 \\ <br /> e^{\pi i} = - 1 \\ <br /> \left( {e^{\pi i} } \right)^2 = \left( { - 1} \right)^2 \\ <br /> e^{2\pi i} = 1 \\ <br /> \ln \left( {e^{2\pi i} } \right) = \ln \left( 1 \right) \\ <br /> 2\pi i = 0 \\ <br /> \frac{{2\pi i}}{{\pi i}} = \frac{0}{{\pi i}} \\ <br /> 2 = 0 \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So, how did you define the logarithm on complex numbers??
 
ln(1) = 2kπi, where k is any integer. ln is a multivalued function.
 
Onyxus said:
I was messing around with Euler’s Identity and I think I accidently disproved it. I would like someone to check my math to make sure I didn’t make any rookie mistakes.

<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> e^{\pi i} + 1 = 0 \\ <br /> e^{\pi i} = - 1 \\ <br /> \left( {e^{\pi i} } \right)^2 = \left( { - 1} \right)^2 \\ <br /> e^{2\pi i} = 1 \\ <br /> \ln \left( {e^{2\pi i} } \right) = \ln \left( 1 \right) \\ <br /> 2\pi i = 0 \\ <br /> \frac{{2\pi i}}{{\pi i}} = \frac{0}{{\pi i}} \\ <br /> 2 = 0 \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />



What gives you away as a rookie is the title of your post, not your mathematics...which are also wrong.

Perhaps you'll be interested in reading about the complex logarithmic function's definition...

DonAntonio
 
edit: student posted under my account
 
Thank you, DonAntonio, mathman and micromass, I thought that was what my error was, but I wasn't sure. You see, I haven't yet taken a course in which I learn even the basics of complex numbers, so my knowledge in that area is rather lacking.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top