Dissociation Constant of Weak Acids

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the pH and dissociation constant (Ka) of an unknown weak acid at a concentration of 0.20 mol/L, one must first measure the pH of the acid or know its Ka. The initial assumption that Ka equals (0.20)^2/0.20 is incorrect without pH data. A pH titration can provide necessary data to create a titration curve, which can be used to determine Ka. Resources such as Borek's online guidance and studies on neutralization titrations for weak acids may assist in understanding the process. Accurate calculations depend on proper measurement and analysis of the acid's behavior in solution.
lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In my lab, it says that i have to calculate the pH and the Ka of an unknown acid of known concentration (0.20 mol/L)..however, the part that is confusing me is that we first had to obtain 40 mL of that particular unknown acid...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that [HA]--> <--- [H]+ +[A]- ..i initially thought that it's Ka is simply (0.20)^2/0.20 but i think it's wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You either MEASURE the pH of the unknown acid, or you KNOW THE Ka or identity of the acid. Other than that, you perform a pH titration and make a TITRATION CURVE. Your Ka expression can be coordinated to certain data from your pH titration data (or the curve). Borek has some online guidance that may help with this theory. Another choice is to study the theory of neutralization titrations, especially for weak acids and bases.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top