MHB Distance Between Erie & Buffalo: 17 to 83 Miles

  • Thread starter Thread starter tkhunny
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Erie and Buffalo are not 70 miles apart, as indicated by highway signs showing Erie at 17 miles and Buffalo at 87 miles. Subsequent signs further clarify the distances, with one indicating Erie at 11 miles and Buffalo at 81 miles. The discussion highlights that road signs reflect road distances, not geographical distances, suggesting a potential T-junction scenario. Despite the signs being exact, the linear travel assumption complicates the interpretation of distances. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the road distance from Erie to Buffalo could be as much as 92 miles, depending on the route taken.
tkhunny
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
1) Erie and Buffalo are NOT 70 miles apart.

2) Correct sign on the highway reads:

Erie: 17 miles
Buffalo: 87 miles

3) Four miles later, another correct sign reads:

Erie: 13 miles
Buffalo: 83 miles

4) If I am going to Erie, what will the sign say about Buffalo when I get there?

Enough information? Too easy?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think steps 2 and 3 imply that you, Erie, and Buffalo are colinear, but this is not an option due to 1. My reasoning is that if when you move 4 miles, you are exactly 4 miles closer to Erie, it implies you are going straight towards Erie (shortest path in a plane) and so there is no way you can also be 4 miles closer to Buffalo unless you are also going straight towards Buffalo. When you say "four miles", is it distance traveled or displacement? How accurate are the signs?

My first thought was that this was an ellipse problem, but I am no longer sure.. tricky challenge!​
 
Clarifications:

Signs are exact.
Travel is linear.
Travel Distance = Displacement -- No turns and no rifts in the space/time continuum.

There may not be enough information.

3a) 2 miles later, a correct sign reads:

Erie: 11 miles
Buffalo: 81 miles

3b) After that, there are no more such signs.
 
Last edited:
tkhunny said:
Clarifications:

Signs are exact.
Travel is linear.
Travel Distance = Displacement -- No turns and no rifts in the space/time continuum.

There may not be enough information.

3a) 2 miles later, a correct sign reads:

Erie: 11 miles
Buffalo: 81 miles

3b) After that, there are no more such signs.
Road signs show road distances, not geographical distances. Perhaps at 11 miles from Erie, the road comes to a T junction. If you turn left it is 11 miles to Erie, if you turn right it is 81 miles to Buffalo. From Erie to Buffalo it is then 11+81=92 miles.
 
Opalg said:
Road signs show road distances, not geographical distances. Perhaps at 11 miles from Erie, the road comes to a T junction. If you turn left it is 11 miles to Erie, if you turn right it is 81 miles to Buffalo. From Erie to Buffalo it is then 11+81=92 miles.

TKhunny specified no turns, though, so the road has to be straight, which sort of implies that road distance is the same as geographical distance (on the Earth's surface, anyway).
 
Opalg has it. Road signs give mileage on the road, whether the road turns or not. More of a Y-junction, though. Check out I-86 and I-90 between Erie and Buffalo, 11 miles East of Erie. Coming West on I-86 we see the signs that are maybe a little confusing. There is very little turn to Erie and quite a sharp turn toward Buffalo.

If there were such a sign when entering Erie, it might say, "Buffalo is 92 miles BEHIND YOU!"

Thanks for playing!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top