Distance between two events w.r.t. two frames

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-7-13_10-5-2.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Distance between events w.r.t. Earth frame,

De = | (1/2)w(t+Γ)2 - 350 - (1/2)wt2 | = 242 m

Distance between events w.r.t. train frame,
Dt =350 m , correct?
As w.r.t. train frame , the train is not moving.

But, a person on the train will observe that the train is accelerating.
But , if the train is not moving, then how will this person observe that the train is accelerating. Here , I am doing some mistake. Please help me.W.r.t. Earth's frame, the two events occur at (x1,t1) and (x2,t2)
such that x1 - x2= 242 m
and t2 - t1 = 60 s

At t = 0 s, origin of both K's and Earth's frames meet each other.
W.r.t. K's frame, the two events occur at (x'1,t1) and (x'2,t2)
such that x'1 - x'2= 0 m
and t2 - t1 = 60 s
x'1 - x'2= 0 m = x1 - Vt1 - x2 + Vt2

x1 - x2 = - V( t2 - t1 )

V = 242/60 = 4.0 m/s
 
on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
But, a person on the train will observe that the train is accelerating.
No it will not. The train frame is a non-inertial frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
Orodruin said:
No it will not. The train frame is a non-inertial frame.

How can I,too, reach to this conclusion?
If a person sitting in an accelerating train wants to measure the acceleration of the train, won't he measure the acceleration to be nonzero?
 
Orodruin said:
No it will not. The train frame is a non-inertial frame.

How can I,too, reach to this conclusion?
If a person sitting in an accelerating train wants to measure the acceleration of the train, won't he measure the acceleration to be nonzero?
 
Pushoam said:
How can I,too, reach to this conclusion?
If a person sitting in an accelerating train wants to measure the acceleration of the train, won't he measure the acceleration to be nonzero?
This depends on what you mean by "measuring the acceleration". An accelerometer will give you a non-zero value, but it will read the same in all frames. By definition of the train frame, the train is stationary in that frame and therefore not accelerating.
 
Orodruin said:
An accelerometer will give you a non-zero value, but it will read the same in all frames.
Does "all" imply both inertial and non-inertial frames?
Orodruin said:
By definition of the train frame, the train is stationary in that frame and therefore not accelerating.
So, we reach to that conclusion by definition.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K