How to Find Position as a Function of Time for Accelerated Charged Particles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Homo sapiens sapiens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
To find the position of an accelerated charged particle as a function of time, the discussion revolves around applying Coulomb's law and Newton's second law. The force acting on the moving particle is expressed as F=(k*q*Q)/r^2, leading to an acceleration equation a=C/(m*x^2). The kinetic energy of the particle is equated to the work done by the electrical force, allowing for the derivation of velocity as a function of position. The challenge lies in separating variables to solve the differential equation for position over time, with the integration process being a point of confusion for some participants. Clarifications were provided regarding the integration steps, emphasizing the correct use of differentials in the equations.
Homo sapiens sapiens
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I’m trying to solve the following problem for a long time:
There are two charged particles, one doesn’t move, the other is being accelerated and is initially at rest, I would use the particle that doesn’t move as the referential, this referential has only one dimension, how do I find the position as a function of time.
I tried this approach, by Coloumb’s law the force in the second particle is F=(k*q*Q)/r^2, for simplification I put a C in place of k*q*Q, now I use Newton’s second law, I get a=C/(m*x^2), then I try to put velocity as a function of time, so the work done on the particle as a function of the distance is found by solving the integral of the force as a function of the distance between x and x0(this is the initial position), I got W=(c/x)-(c/x0), knowing that the particle starts at rest, its kinetic energy must be equal to the work done by the electrical force so W=(mv^2)/2, I put velocity as a function of the position, that is v=√((2c/(xm))-(2c/(x0m))), now the idea of all this stuff was to use the relation a=dv/dt to get the position as a function of time, this is what I don’t know how to do and would appreciate someone’s help in solving the problem this way or a different propose for a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that from the defintion of accelartion:

\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = \frac{C}{mr^2}

multiply both sides by 2\frac{dr}{dt}, integrate with respect to r and take the square root:

\frac{dr}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{-2C}{mr} + A}

Where A is a constant.

Then it's a case of seperating the variables to solve the equation.
 
“Then it's a case of seperating the variables to solve the equation.”
It is this part that I don’t know how to do, could you solve that, please.
 
"Separating the variables" means exactly what it says:
\frac{dr}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{-2C}{mr} + A}
Now get the variable r on one side, the variable t on the other:

dr= \sqrt{\frac{-2C}{mr}+A}dt
\frac{dt}{\sqrt{\frac{-2C}{mr}+A}}= dt

and integrate both sides.
 
Could you explain to me how you passed from dr= \sqrt{\frac{-2C}{mr}+A}dt
to \frac{dt}{\sqrt{\frac{-2C}{mr}+A}}= dt
, when you talk abut integrating the last equation e have no problem integrating the right side, but on the left side there is a dt so the independent variable is t, and I am to solve the integral between two instants t, but on the function that is being integrated there is no t, this doesn’t makes sense to me.
I’m sorry if I am doing trivial questions, but I know few about calculus, thanks for your help and patience.
 
It's quite simple; HallsofIvy made a typo.
On the left-hand side, it should be dr not dt
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Back
Top